How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
34
CCGDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.13
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$0.13 - $0.13
52-week range:
$0.13 - $0.19
Dividend yield:
2.49%
P/E ratio:
23.05x
P/S ratio:
0.80x
P/B ratio:
0.20x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-29.07%
Market cap:
$5.1B
Revenue:
$6.9B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRCBY
Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
$31.72 | -- | $160B | 7.75x | $0.72 | 6.66% | 2.39x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$4.82 | -- | $21.1B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 9.55% | 0.54x |
|
CRCBY
Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.
|
$33.84 | -- | $7.7B | 4.67x | $1.43 | 6.49% | 1.07x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$5.83 | -- | $24.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.72x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$11.71 | $14.14 | $774.7M | 8.95x | $1.16 | 9.88% | 2.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
59.06% | 0.818 | 144.1% | 0.00x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
CRCBY
Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.
|
77.99% | -0.656 | 820.69% | 0.00x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | $6B | 5.5% | 13.71% | 67.12% | $1.7B |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
CRCBY
Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | $470.5M | 2.13% | 9.27% | 68.67% | $997.3M |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.-- $1.08 $384.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or CIHKY More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.292, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.81%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. pays out 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $15.9B. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s net income of $5.5B. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 2.39x for China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.2.39x 7.75x $15.9B $5.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or CMAKY More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.88%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 9.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 0.54x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.54x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or CRCBY?
Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 23.76%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B CRCBYChongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.-- $1.84 $84.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or CRCBY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CRCBYChongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or CRCBY More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.472%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or CRCBY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. pays out 25.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or CRCBY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.'s net income of $430M. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 1.07x for Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- CRCBYChongqing Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd.1.07x 4.67x $1.8B $430M
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or MAAS?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or MAAS More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or MAAS?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or MAAS?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 2.72x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- MAASMaase, Inc.2.72x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or NOAH?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 20.79%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is CCGDF or NOAH More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or NOAH?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or NOAH?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 2.30x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.30x 8.95x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
