Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
21
CCGDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.13
Seasonality move
:
-5.12%
Day range:
$0.13 - $0.13
52-week range:
$0.13 - $0.19
Dividend yield:
2.49%
P/E ratio:
23.05x
P/S ratio:
0.80x
P/B ratio:
0.20x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-29.07%
Market cap:
$5.1B
Revenue:
$6.9B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
$31.32 | -- | $158B | 7.65x | $0.71 | 6.73% | 2.36x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$5.22 | -- | $22.9B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 8.82% | 0.59x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0098 | -- | $312.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$6.01 | -- | $24.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.80x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$12.08 | $14.14 | $799.2M | 9.23x | $1.16 | 9.58% | 2.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
59.06% | 0.818 | 144.1% | 0.00x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 113.926 | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
|
-- | $6B | 5.5% | 13.71% | 67.12% | $1.7B |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.-- $1.08 $384.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or CIHKY More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.292, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.81%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 6.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. pays out 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or CIHKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $15.9B. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s net income of $5.5B. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 2.36x for China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- CIHKYChina Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.2.36x 7.65x $15.9B $5.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or CMAKY More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 8.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or CMAKY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 0.59x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.59x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or JPPYY?
Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or JPPYY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jupai Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jupai Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Jupai Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or JPPYY More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 13.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1251.811%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or JPPYY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Jupai Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Jupai Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or JPPYY?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Jupai Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 0.01x for Jupai Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or MAAS?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CCGDF or MAAS More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or MAAS?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or MAAS?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 2.80x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- MAASMaase, Inc.2.80x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCGDF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CCGDF or NOAH?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 17.09%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is CCGDF or NOAH More Risky?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCGDF or NOAH?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCGDF or NOAH?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.05x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. is 0.80x versus 2.37x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- -- NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.37x 9.23x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
