NOAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.30x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.88%.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 9.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are smaller than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is lower than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.30x versus 0.54x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.14, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.30x versus 2.72x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.