Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
31
NOAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.04
Seasonality move
:
1.09%
Day range:
$9.96 - $10.11
52-week range:
$7.67 - $12.84
Dividend yield:
11.51%
P/E ratio:
7.68x
P/S ratio:
1.97x
P/B ratio:
0.48x
Volume:
93.9K
Avg. volume:
107.8K
1-year change:
-15.62%
Market cap:
$665.2M
Revenue:
$364.2M
EPS (TTM):
$1.31
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $13.12 |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
$168M | -$0.20 | 95.88% | -- | $8.00 |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $5.32 |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$10.05 | $13.12 | $665.2M | 7.68x | $1.16 | 11.51% | 1.97x |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
$1.37 | $8.00 | $485.7M | 8.70x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.44x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
$3.40 | $5.32 | $572.1M | 2.39x | $0.19 | 11.06% | 0.32x |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
$6.91 | -- | $104.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.57x |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.93 | -- | $14.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.99x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.050 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
37.18% | 0.082 | 54.21% | 0.20x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
28.69% | -1.351 | 74.5% | 0.41x |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
-- | -1.882 | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 0.002 | -- | 0.21x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
$26.7M | $20.2M | -21.39% | -26.93% | 9.01% | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
$349.2M | $98.4M | 11.26% | 16.28% | 20.57% | -- |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Noah Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or CANG?
Cango, Inc. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 16.61%. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B CANGCango, Inc.11.89% $0.10 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or CANG?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 30.52%. On the other hand Cango, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 118.98%. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 CANGCango, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is NOAH or CANG More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.113, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.676%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or CANG?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.51%. Cango, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Cango, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or CANG?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are smaller than Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues of $224.6M. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is lower than Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Cango, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 1.97x versus 0.44x for Cango, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.97x 7.68x $89.1M $30.6M CANGCango, Inc.0.44x 8.70x $224.6M $37.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or DXF?
Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or DXF?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 30.52%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 DXFDunxin Financial Holdings0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or DXF More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or DXF?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.51%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or DXF?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 1.97x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.97x 7.68x $89.1M $30.6M DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or LX?
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 15.23%. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.73.02% $0.41 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or LX?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 30.52%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.32 which suggests that it could grow by 56.39%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.3 1 0 -
Is NOAH or LX More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.751%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or LX?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.51%. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 11.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. pays out 16.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or LX?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $478.2M. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $72.8M. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 1.97x versus 0.32x for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.97x 7.68x $89.1M $30.6M LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.0.32x 2.39x $478.2M $72.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or NCTY?
The9 Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B NCTYThe9 Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or NCTY?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 30.52%. On the other hand The9 Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than The9 Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than The9 Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 NCTYThe9 Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or NCTY More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.113%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or NCTY?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.51%. The9 Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or NCTY?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than The9 Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while The9 Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 1.97x versus 5.57x for The9 Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.97x 7.68x $89.1M $30.6M NCTYThe9 Ltd.5.57x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or PT?
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B PTPintec Technology Holdings Ltd.-- -- -$53.4M -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or PT?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 30.52%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 PTPintec Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or PT More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.902%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or PT?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.51%. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or PT?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 1.97x versus 2.99x for Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.97x 7.68x $89.1M $30.6M PTPintec Technology Holdings Ltd.2.99x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
