Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
37
NOAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.24
Seasonality move
:
-2.04%
Day range:
$10.89 - $11.28
52-week range:
$7.67 - $12.84
Dividend yield:
10.58%
P/E ratio:
8.36x
P/S ratio:
2.15x
P/B ratio:
0.52x
Volume:
100.2K
Avg. volume:
109.9K
1-year change:
2.72%
Market cap:
$723.7M
Revenue:
$364.2M
EPS (TTM):
$1.31
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $13.12 |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
$179.3M | -$0.27 | 92.52% | -- | $8.00 |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$10.94 | $13.12 | $723.7M | 8.36x | $1.16 | 10.58% | 2.15x |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
$1.57 | $8.00 | $556.6M | 8.70x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.51x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
$6.67 | -- | $100.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.37x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.95 | -- | $4.6M | 2.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.04 | -- | $16.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.34x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 1.938 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
37.18% | 0.343 | 54.21% | 0.20x |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
-- | -1.909 | -- | -- |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
1.33% | -0.008 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -0.131 | -- | 0.21x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
|
CANG
Cango, Inc.
|
$26.7M | $20.2M | -21.39% | -26.93% | 9.01% | -- |
|
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
|
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Noah Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or CANG?
Cango, Inc. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 16.61%. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B CANGCango, Inc.11.89% $0.10 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or CANG?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand Cango, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 122.93%. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 CANGCango, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is NOAH or CANG More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.719, which suggesting that the stock is 28.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.162, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or CANG?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.58%. Cango, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Cango, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or CANG?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are smaller than Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues of $224.6M. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is lower than Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Cango, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.15x versus 0.51x for Cango, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.15x 8.36x $89.1M $30.6M CANGCango, Inc.0.51x 8.70x $224.6M $37.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or DXF?
Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or DXF?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 DXFDunxin Financial Holdings0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or DXF More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.719, which suggesting that the stock is 28.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or DXF?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.58%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or DXF?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.15x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.15x 8.36x $89.1M $30.6M DXFDunxin Financial Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or NCTY?
The9 Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B NCTYThe9 Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or NCTY?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand The9 Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than The9 Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than The9 Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 NCTYThe9 Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or NCTY More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.719, which suggesting that the stock is 28.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.186%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or NCTY?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.58%. The9 Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or NCTY?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than The9 Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while The9 Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.15x versus 5.37x for The9 Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.15x 8.36x $89.1M $30.6M NCTYThe9 Ltd.5.37x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or NISN?
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or NISN?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9478.95%. Given that Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or NISN More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.719, which suggesting that the stock is 28.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.131%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or NISN?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.58%. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or NISN?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.15x versus 0.02x for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.15x 8.36x $89.1M $30.6M NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0.02x 2.83x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOAH or PT?
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 34.3% compared to Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63% beat Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B PTPintec Technology Holdings Ltd.-- -- -$53.4M -
What do Analysts Say About NOAH or PT?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 1 PTPintec Technology Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NOAH or PT More Risky?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.719, which suggesting that the stock is 28.052% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.408%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOAH or PT?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.58%. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOAH or PT?
Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $89.1M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings Ltd. is 2.15x versus 3.34x for Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.15x 8.36x $89.1M $30.6M PTPintec Technology Holdings Ltd.3.34x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 58.95% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 8.88% over the past day.
Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7
Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is up 2.99% over the past day.
