CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.083%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M is higher than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4K. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.28x versus -- for China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dynastar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Dynastar Holdings, Inc..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -3.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 458.241%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynastar Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynastar Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than Dynastar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M is higher than Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.28x versus -- for Dynastar Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICICI Bank Ltd. has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of 17.56%. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat ICICI Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.66%.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand ICICI Bank Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $39.13 which suggests that it could grow by 26.54%. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than ICICI Bank Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than ICICI Bank Ltd..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICICI Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.465%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICICI Bank Ltd. offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICICI Bank Ltd. pays out 12.37% of its earnings as a dividend. ICICI Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are smaller than ICICI Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M is lower than ICICI Bank Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while ICICI Bank Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.28x versus 3.17x for ICICI Bank Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat Scully Royalty Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand Scully Royalty Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Scully Royalty Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Scully Royalty Ltd..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scully Royalty Ltd. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.655%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scully Royalty Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scully Royalty Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than Scully Royalty Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M is higher than Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Scully Royalty Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.28x versus 5.20x for Scully Royalty Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.