CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -158.82% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 539.8%. On the other hand Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dynastar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Dynastar Holdings, Inc..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -3.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 418.947%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.9%. Dynastar Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynastar Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $179.5M, which are larger than Dynastar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cango, Inc.'s net income of -$285M is higher than Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.16x versus -- for Dynastar Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Barrick Mining has a net margin of -158.82% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of 15.14%. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat Barrick Mining's return on equity of 7.06%.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 539.8%. On the other hand Barrick Mining has an analysts' consensus of $24.36 which suggests that it could grow by 29.14%. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Barrick Mining, analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Barrick Mining.

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barrick Mining has a beta of 0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.128%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.9%. Barrick Mining offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Mining pays out 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $179.5M, which are smaller than Barrick Mining quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Cango, Inc.'s net income of -$285M is lower than Barrick Mining's net income of $474M. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Barrick Mining's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.16x versus 2.47x for Barrick Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICICI Bank Ltd. has a net margin of -158.82% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of 17.56%. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat ICICI Bank Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.66%.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 539.8%. On the other hand ICICI Bank Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $37.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.4%. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than ICICI Bank Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than ICICI Bank Ltd..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICICI Bank Ltd. has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.123%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.9%. ICICI Bank Ltd. offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICICI Bank Ltd. pays out 12.37% of its earnings as a dividend. ICICI Bank Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $179.5M, which are smaller than ICICI Bank Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Cango, Inc.'s net income of -$285M is lower than ICICI Bank Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while ICICI Bank Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.16x versus 2.61x for ICICI Bank Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a net margin of -158.82% compared to Cango, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93% beat Scully Royalty Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Cango, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 539.8%. On the other hand Scully Royalty Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Scully Royalty Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Scully Royalty Ltd..

Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scully Royalty Ltd. has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.392%.

Cango, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.9%. Scully Royalty Ltd. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Cango, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scully Royalty Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues are $179.5M, which are larger than Scully Royalty Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Cango, Inc.'s net income of -$285M is higher than Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Cango, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Scully Royalty Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango, Inc. is 0.16x versus 4.25x for Scully Royalty Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.