CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of 3.35%. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.22%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 110.08%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Cango's net income of $7.8M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.28x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of --. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.22%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1308.48%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.341, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.939%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are larger than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Cango's net income of $7.8M is higher than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.28x versus 0.93x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of -23.56%. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.22%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 99.48%. Given that Tuniu has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Tuniu is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.56%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $14.3M. Cango's net income of $7.8M is higher than Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Tuniu's PE ratio is 9.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.28x versus 1.44x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vipshop Holdings has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Cango's net margin of 7.36%. Cango's return on equity of 7.6% beat Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 19.51%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -15.22%. On the other hand Vipshop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.62 which suggests that it could grow by 32.32%. Given that Vipshop Holdings has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Vipshop Holdings is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.371, which suggesting that the stock is 62.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.673%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vipshop Holdings offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vipshop Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $92.8M, which are smaller than Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Cango's net income of $7.8M is lower than Vipshop Holdings's net income of $340.1M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Vipshop Holdings's PE ratio is 6.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 3.28x versus 0.45x for Vipshop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.