CIFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -359.95% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -69.65%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -9.21% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.93%.

Cipher Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.9%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could grow by 123.58%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Cipher Mining, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Cipher Mining.

Cipher Mining has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 316.215%.

Cipher Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cipher Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cipher Mining quarterly revenues are $24.1M, which are smaller than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $89.3M. Cipher Mining's net income of -$86.8M is lower than Cleanspark's net income of -$62.2M. Notably, Cipher Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while Cleanspark's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cipher Mining is 10.93x versus 6.14x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -359.95% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -94.79%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -9.21% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 7.75%.

Cipher Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.9%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $26.83 which suggests that it could grow by 33.17%. Given that Cipher Mining has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Cipher Mining is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Cipher Mining has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 463.426%.

Cipher Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cipher Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cipher Mining quarterly revenues are $24.1M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $131.6M. Cipher Mining's net income of -$86.8M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$124.8M. Notably, Cipher Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 22.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cipher Mining is 10.93x versus 9.15x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -359.95% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -182.06%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -9.21% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

Cipher Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.9%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 53.39%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Cipher Mining, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Cipher Mining.

Cipher Mining has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

Cipher Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cipher Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cipher Mining quarterly revenues are $24.1M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. Cipher Mining's net income of -$86.8M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, Cipher Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 58.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cipher Mining is 10.93x versus 9.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -359.95% compared to Cipher Mining's net margin of -84.01%. Cipher Mining's return on equity of -9.21% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09%.

Cipher Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 51.9%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.94 which suggests that it could grow by 59.51%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Cipher Mining, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Cipher Mining.

Cipher Mining has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.541, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.119%.

Cipher Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cipher Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cipher Mining quarterly revenues are $24.1M, which are smaller than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $27.1M. Cipher Mining's net income of -$86.8M is lower than TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M. Notably, Cipher Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cipher Mining is 10.93x versus 15.46x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.