CORZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bakkt Holdings has a net margin of -477.44% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of -0.88%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat Bakkt Holdings's return on equity of -39.71%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 35.23%. On the other hand Bakkt Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -55.78%. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than Bakkt Holdings, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than Bakkt Holdings.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bakkt Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bakkt Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bakkt Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $95.4M, which are smaller than Bakkt Holdings quarterly revenues of $328.4M. Core Scientific's net income of -$455.3M is lower than Bakkt Holdings's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Bakkt Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 7.64x versus 0.08x for Bakkt Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Creative Realities has a net margin of -477.44% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of 0.37%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 35.23%. On the other hand Creative Realities has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 169.78%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Core Scientific, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Core Scientific.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Realities has a beta of 3.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.506%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Creative Realities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Realities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $95.4M, which are larger than Creative Realities quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Core Scientific's net income of -$455.3M is lower than Creative Realities's net income of $54K. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Creative Realities's PE ratio is 18.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 7.64x versus 0.54x for Creative Realities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digimarc has a net margin of -477.44% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of -113.88%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat Digimarc's return on equity of -56.45%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 35.23%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.27%. Given that Core Scientific has higher upside potential than Digimarc, analysts believe Core Scientific is more attractive than Digimarc.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.892%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $95.4M, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Core Scientific's net income of -$455.3M is lower than Digimarc's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 7.64x versus 20.47x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -477.44% compared to Core Scientific's net margin of 4.75%. Core Scientific's return on equity of -- beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.92%.

Core Scientific has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 35.23%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.42%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Core Scientific, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Core Scientific.

Core Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.58%.

Core Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Scientific quarterly revenues are $95.4M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.4M. Core Scientific's net income of -$455.3M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Core Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 260.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Scientific is 7.64x versus 6.53x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.