AEVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Datavault AI, Inc. has a net margin of -450.35% compared to Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 1.95%. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -754.17% beat Datavault AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -68.22%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.11, signalling upside risk potential of 82.24%. On the other hand Datavault AI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 316.03%. Given that Datavault AI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aeva Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Datavault AI, Inc. is more attractive than Aeva Technologies, Inc..

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datavault AI, Inc. has a beta of 0.125, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.519%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datavault AI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datavault AI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.6M, which are smaller than Datavault AI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $33.8M. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$25.3M is lower than Datavault AI, Inc.'s net income of $661K. Notably, Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Datavault AI, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies, Inc. is 42.40x versus 3.89x for Datavault AI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CalEthos, Inc. has a net margin of -450.35% compared to Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -754.17% beat CalEthos, Inc.'s return on equity of -669.62%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.11, signalling upside risk potential of 82.24%. On the other hand CalEthos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aeva Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than CalEthos, Inc., analysts believe Aeva Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than CalEthos, Inc..

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CalEthos, Inc. has a beta of 2.482, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 148.187%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CalEthos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CalEthos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.6M, which are larger than CalEthos, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$25.3M is lower than CalEthos, Inc.'s net income of -$658K. Notably, Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CalEthos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies, Inc. is 42.40x versus 428.02x for CalEthos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of -450.35% compared to Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 28.34%. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -754.17% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 37.05%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.11, signalling upside risk potential of 82.24%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $313.40 which suggests that it could grow by 26.29%. Given that Aeva Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Aeva Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.235%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Aeva Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 60.09% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.6M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$25.3M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $5.6B. Notably, Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies, Inc. is 42.40x versus 3.56x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unisys Corp. has a net margin of -450.35% compared to Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 3.45%. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -754.17% beat Unisys Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.11, signalling upside risk potential of 82.24%. On the other hand Unisys Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.88 which suggests that it could grow by 136.65%. Given that Unisys Corp. has higher upside potential than Aeva Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Unisys Corp. is more attractive than Aeva Technologies, Inc..

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unisys Corp. has a beta of 1.458, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.788%.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unisys Corp. offers a yield of 245.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unisys Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.6M, which are smaller than Unisys Corp. quarterly revenues of $574.5M. Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$25.3M is lower than Unisys Corp.'s net income of $19.8M. Notably, Aeva Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unisys Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies, Inc. is 42.40x versus 0.07x for Unisys Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.