SRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cango, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net margin of 16.61%. Scully Royalty Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Cango, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.93%.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cango, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 240.91%. Given that Cango, Inc. has higher upside potential than Scully Royalty Ltd., analysts believe Cango, Inc. is more attractive than Scully Royalty Ltd..

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango, Inc. has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.497%.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scully Royalty Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cango, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scully Royalty Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cango, Inc. quarterly revenues of $224.6M. Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Cango, Inc.'s net income of $37.3M. Notably, Scully Royalty Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cango, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scully Royalty Ltd. is 5.20x versus 0.28x for Cango, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net margin of --. Scully Royalty Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Scully Royalty Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Scully Royalty Ltd. is more attractive than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc..

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.083%.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scully Royalty Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scully Royalty Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4K. Notably, Scully Royalty Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scully Royalty Ltd. is 5.20x versus -- for China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net margin of --. Scully Royalty Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Scully Royalty Ltd. has higher upside potential than Dynastar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Scully Royalty Ltd. is more attractive than Dynastar Holdings, Inc..

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynastar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -3.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 458.241%.

Scully Royalty Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynastar Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scully Royalty Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynastar Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scully Royalty Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dynastar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Scully Royalty Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Scully Royalty Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dynastar Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scully Royalty Ltd. is 5.20x versus -- for Dynastar Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.