NCTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to The9 Ltd.'s net margin of --. The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

The9 Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The9 Ltd. has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe The9 Ltd. is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The9 Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The9 Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. The9 Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, The9 Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 Ltd. is 5.21x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maase, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to The9 Ltd.'s net margin of --. The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

The9 Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The9 Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe The9 Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..

The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 190.843%.

The9 Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The9 Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. The9 Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, The9 Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 Ltd. is 5.21x versus 2.35x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The9 Ltd.'s net margin of --. The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

The9 Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The9 Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd., analysts believe The9 Ltd. is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd..

The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.902%.

The9 Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The9 Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. The9 Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, The9 Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 Ltd. is 5.21x versus 2.93x for Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to The9 Ltd.'s net margin of 27.52%. The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

The9 Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Qfin Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.89 which suggests that it could grow by 68.07%. Given that Qfin Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The9 Ltd., analysts believe Qfin Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than The9 Ltd..

The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.772%.

The9 Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qfin Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 10.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. The9 Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Qfin Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $727.3M. The9 Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $200.1M. Notably, The9 Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 Ltd. is 5.21x versus 1.00x for Qfin Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.