WDH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FinVolution Group has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of 18.38%. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat FinVolution Group's return on equity of 17.68%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 26.61%. On the other hand FinVolution Group has an analysts' consensus of $7.55 which suggests that it could grow by 34.3%. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than Waterdrop, Inc., analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than Waterdrop, Inc..

Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.286, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.423%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. FinVolution Group offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group pays out 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are smaller than FinVolution Group quarterly revenues of $490.4M. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is lower than FinVolution Group's net income of $90.1M. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while FinVolution Group's PE ratio is 3.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.47x versus 0.77x for FinVolution Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of --. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 26.61%. On the other hand Jupai Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jupai Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than Jupai Holdings Ltd..

Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 9.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 860.326%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Jupai Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jupai Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are larger than Jupai Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is higher than Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.47x versus 0.01x for Jupai Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of 15.23%. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.28%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 26.61%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.42 which suggests that it could grow by 87.47%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Waterdrop, Inc., analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Waterdrop, Inc..

Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.048%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 13.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. pays out 16.71% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $478.2M. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $72.8M. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.47x versus 0.27x for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of 34.3%. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 26.61%. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 19.67%. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..

Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.733, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.741%.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is lower than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.35x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.47x versus 2.32x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.