Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
80
WDH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.84
Seasonality move
:
7.1%
Day range:
$1.77 - $1.86
52-week range:
$1.08 - $2.18
Dividend yield:
2.7%
P/E ratio:
9.66x
P/S ratio:
1.52x
P/B ratio:
1.21x
Volume:
400.3K
Avg. volume:
338.2K
1-year change:
55.46%
Market cap:
$669.1M
Revenue:
$385.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.19
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDH
Waterdrop, Inc.
|
$120.4M | $0.04 | 22.56% | 7.82% | $2.27 |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINV
FinVolution Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $7.55 |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $5.32 |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDH
Waterdrop, Inc.
|
$1.85 | $2.27 | $669.1M | 9.66x | $0.03 | 2.7% | 1.52x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
FINV
FinVolution Group
|
$5.30 | $7.55 | $1.3B | 3.61x | $0.28 | 5.23% | 0.72x |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
$2.81 | $5.32 | $472.8M | 1.98x | $0.19 | 13.38% | 0.26x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$5.83 | -- | $24.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.72x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$11.71 | $14.14 | $774.7M | 8.95x | $1.16 | 9.88% | 2.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDH
Waterdrop, Inc.
|
1.65% | -0.545 | 1.75% | 2.45x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
FINV
FinVolution Group
|
6.54% | -0.647 | 8.43% | 2.83x |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
28.69% | -1.519 | 74.5% | 0.41x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDH
Waterdrop, Inc.
|
$70.3M | $16M | 9.76% | 10.01% | 11.67% | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
FINV
FinVolution Group
|
$383.8M | $103M | 17.16% | 17.68% | 26.51% | $124.3M |
|
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
|
$349.2M | $98.4M | 11.26% | 16.28% | 20.57% | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
Waterdrop, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WDH or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of --. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WDHWaterdrop, Inc.51.26% $0.06 $724.5M CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About WDH or CCGDF?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WDHWaterdrop, Inc.3 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WDH or CCGDF More Risky?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WDH or CCGDF?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WDH or CCGDF?
Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.52x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WDHWaterdrop, Inc.1.52x 9.66x $137.1M $22.3M CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WDH or FINV?
FinVolution Group has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of 18.38%. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat FinVolution Group's return on equity of 17.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WDHWaterdrop, Inc.51.26% $0.06 $724.5M FINVFinVolution Group78.27% $0.33 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About WDH or FINV?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand FinVolution Group has an analysts' consensus of $7.55 which suggests that it could grow by 42.4%. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than Waterdrop, Inc., analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than Waterdrop, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WDHWaterdrop, Inc.3 0 0 FINVFinVolution Group7 0 0 -
Is WDH or FINV More Risky?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.594%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WDH or FINV?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. FinVolution Group offers a yield of 5.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group pays out 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WDH or FINV?
Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are smaller than FinVolution Group quarterly revenues of $490.4M. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is lower than FinVolution Group's net income of $90.1M. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while FinVolution Group's PE ratio is 3.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.52x versus 0.72x for FinVolution Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WDHWaterdrop, Inc.1.52x 9.66x $137.1M $22.3M FINVFinVolution Group0.72x 3.61x $490.4M $90.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns WDH or LX?
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of 15.23%. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WDHWaterdrop, Inc.51.26% $0.06 $724.5M LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.73.02% $0.41 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About WDH or LX?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.32 which suggests that it could grow by 89.23%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Waterdrop, Inc., analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Waterdrop, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WDHWaterdrop, Inc.3 0 0 LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.3 1 0 -
Is WDH or LX More Risky?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.519%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WDH or LX?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 13.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. pays out 16.71% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WDH or LX?
Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $478.2M. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $72.8M. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 1.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.52x versus 0.26x for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WDHWaterdrop, Inc.1.52x 9.66x $137.1M $22.3M LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.0.26x 1.98x $478.2M $72.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns WDH or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of --. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WDHWaterdrop, Inc.51.26% $0.06 $724.5M MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WDH or MAAS?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WDHWaterdrop, Inc.3 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is WDH or MAAS More Risky?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WDH or MAAS?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WDH or MAAS?
Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.52x versus 2.72x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WDHWaterdrop, Inc.1.52x 9.66x $137.1M $22.3M MAASMaase, Inc.2.72x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WDH or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 16.26% compared to Waterdrop, Inc.'s net margin of 34.3%. Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WDHWaterdrop, Inc.51.26% $0.06 $724.5M NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About WDH or NOAH?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.27, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 20.79%. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than Noah Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WDHWaterdrop, Inc.3 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is WDH or NOAH More Risky?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WDH or NOAH?
Waterdrop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Waterdrop, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WDH or NOAH?
Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $137.1M, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M is lower than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, Waterdrop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waterdrop, Inc. is 1.52x versus 2.30x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WDHWaterdrop, Inc.1.52x 9.66x $137.1M $22.3M NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.30x 8.95x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
