EIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 13.04%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 13.41% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.791%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $224M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Employers Holdings's net income of $30.3M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.37x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 38.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 5.85x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of -65.47%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 13.41% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.459%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $224M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Employers Holdings's net income of $30.3M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.37x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 0.40x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 7.46%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 13.41% beat Root's return on equity of -9.03%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $70.43 which suggests that it could grow by 1.17%. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $224M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $305.7M. Employers Holdings's net income of $30.3M is higher than Root's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.37x while Root's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 1.10x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 12.14%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 13.41% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.98%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $52.44 which suggests that it could grow by 14.29%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Employers Holdings, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Employers Holdings.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.714% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $224M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $302M. Employers Holdings's net income of $30.3M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.37x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 14.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 1.74x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.