ROOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 7.46% compared to Root's net margin of 13.04%. Root's return on equity of -9.03% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

Root has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.41%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.851%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Root quarterly revenues are $305.7M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Root's net income of $22.8M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 38.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.06x versus 5.87x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hippo Holdings has a net margin of 7.46% compared to Root's net margin of -8.9%. Root's return on equity of -9.03% beat Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -35.13%.

Root has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.41%. On the other hand Hippo Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.45%. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hippo Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hippo Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Root quarterly revenues are $305.7M, which are larger than Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues of $95.5M. Root's net income of $22.8M is higher than Hippo Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hippo Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.06x versus 1.92x for Hippo Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lemonade has a net margin of 7.46% compared to Root's net margin of -49.56%. Root's return on equity of -9.03% beat Lemonade's return on equity of -32.12%.

Root has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.41%. On the other hand Lemonade has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -24.69%. Given that Lemonade has more downside risk than Root, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Lemonade.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lemonade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lemonade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Root quarterly revenues are $305.7M, which are larger than Lemonade quarterly revenues of $136.6M. Root's net income of $22.8M is higher than Lemonade's net income of -$67.7M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lemonade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.06x versus 5.94x for Lemonade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 7.46% compared to Root's net margin of 12.14%. Root's return on equity of -9.03% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6%.

Root has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.41%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.83%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Root.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Root quarterly revenues are $305.7M, which are larger than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $302M. Root's net income of $22.8M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.06x versus 1.91x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.