TRUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aflac, Inc. has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Trupanion, Inc.'s net margin of 34.58%. Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54% beat Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.88%. On the other hand Aflac, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $110.85 which suggests that it could grow by 0.72%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.788%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aflac, Inc. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Trupanion, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac, Inc. pays out 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9M, which are smaller than Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M is lower than Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, Trupanion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 106.03x while Aflac, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion, Inc. is 1.16x versus 3.40x for Aflac, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Erie Indemnity Co. has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Trupanion, Inc.'s net margin of 17.13%. Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54% beat Erie Indemnity Co.'s return on equity of 30.87%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.88%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity Co., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Erie Indemnity Co..

Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity Co. has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.396%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity Co. offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Trupanion, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co. pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity Co. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M is lower than Erie Indemnity Co.'s net income of $182.9M. Notably, Trupanion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 106.03x while Erie Indemnity Co.'s PE ratio is 23.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion, Inc. is 1.16x versus 3.70x for Erie Indemnity Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root, Inc. has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Trupanion, Inc.'s net margin of -1.39%. Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54% beat Root, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.96%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.88%. On the other hand Root, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.75 which suggests that it could grow by 70.25%. Given that Root, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trupanion, Inc., analysts believe Root, Inc. is more attractive than Trupanion, Inc..

Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root, Inc. has a beta of 2.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.898%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9M, which are smaller than Root, Inc. quarterly revenues of $387.8M. Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M is higher than Root, Inc.'s net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Trupanion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 106.03x while Root, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion, Inc. is 1.16x versus 0.84x for Root, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Trupanion, Inc.'s net margin of 12.01%. Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.41%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.88%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.16%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc..

Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.431% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trupanion, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $382.2M. Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of $45.9M. Notably, Trupanion, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 106.03x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion, Inc. is 1.16x versus 1.62x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.