BOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assurant, Inc. has a net margin of 10.58% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.22%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.37% beat Assurant, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.8%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.29, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Assurant, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $259.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Assurant, Inc., analysts believe Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Assurant, Inc..

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assurant, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.781%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Assurant, Inc. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant, Inc. pays out 20.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are smaller than Assurant, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M is lower than Assurant, Inc.'s net income of $265.6M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Assurant, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.98x for Assurant, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Erie Indemnity Co. has a net margin of 10.58% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.13%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.37% beat Erie Indemnity Co.'s return on equity of 30.87%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.29, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity Co., analysts believe Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Erie Indemnity Co..

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity Co. has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.849%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity Co. offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co. pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity Co. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M is lower than Erie Indemnity Co.'s net income of $182.9M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Erie Indemnity Co.'s PE ratio is 23.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. is 1.60x versus 3.69x for Erie Indemnity Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root, Inc. has a net margin of 10.58% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1.39%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.37% beat Root, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.96%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.29, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Root, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $111.60 which suggests that it could grow by 79.62%. Given that Root, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Root, Inc. is more attractive than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc..

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root, Inc. has a beta of 2.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.116%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are smaller than Root, Inc. quarterly revenues of $387.8M. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M is higher than Root, Inc.'s net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Root, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.72x for Root, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion, Inc. has a net margin of 10.58% compared to Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.6%. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.37% beat Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.29, signalling upside risk potential of 39.6%. On the other hand Trupanion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $50.75 which suggests that it could grow by 58.64%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc..

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.344%.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are smaller than Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9M. Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M is higher than Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Trupanion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 89.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bowhead Specialty Holdings, Inc. is 1.60x versus 0.98x for Trupanion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.