CNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marcus Corp. has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.72%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.43% beat Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.82, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Marcus Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.33%. Given that Marcus Corp. has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Marcus Corp. is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.941%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Marcus Corp. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays 31.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus Corp. pays out 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus Corp.'s is not.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are larger than Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues of $210.2M. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.6M is higher than Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.11x while Marcus Corp.'s PE ratio is 69.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 0.68x for Marcus Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix, Inc. has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.92%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.43% beat Netflix, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.48%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.82, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Netflix, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $111.43 which suggests that it could grow by 41.64%. Given that Netflix, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Netflix, Inc. is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix, Inc. has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.072%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Netflix, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays 31.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are smaller than Netflix, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.1B. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.6M is lower than Netflix, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.11x while Netflix, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 7.55x for Netflix, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Skydance Corp. has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.9%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.43% beat Paramount Skydance Corp.'s return on equity of 1.2%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.82, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Paramount Skydance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 34.39%. Given that Paramount Skydance Corp. has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Skydance Corp. is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Skydance Corp. has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.631%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Paramount Skydance Corp. offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays 31.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp. pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are smaller than Paramount Skydance Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.6M is lower than Paramount Skydance Corp.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.11x while Paramount Skydance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 0.29x for Paramount Skydance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reading International, Inc. has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -8.25%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.43% beat Reading International, Inc.'s return on equity of -729.14%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.82, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Reading International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 86.92%. Given that Reading International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Reading International, Inc. is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reading International, Inc. has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.235%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Reading International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays 31.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Reading International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $776.3M, which are larger than Reading International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $52.2M. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $34.6M is higher than Reading International, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.11x while Reading International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.09x versus 0.11x for Reading International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.