CNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marcus Corp. has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.72%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.97% beat Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.95%. On the other hand Marcus Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.25 which suggests that it could grow by 50.97%. Given that Marcus Corp. has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Marcus Corp. is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.482%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Marcus Corp. offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus Corp. pays out 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $857.5M, which are larger than Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues of $210.2M. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while Marcus Corp.'s PE ratio is 65.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.01x versus 0.64x for Marcus Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix, Inc. has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 21.88%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.97% beat Netflix, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.61%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.95%. On the other hand Netflix, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.19 which suggests that it could grow by 33.58%. Given that Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Netflix, Inc., analysts believe Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Netflix, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.706%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Netflix, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $857.5M, which are smaller than Netflix, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than Netflix, Inc.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while Netflix, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.01x versus 9.51x for Netflix, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Skydance Corp. has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.9%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.97% beat Paramount Skydance Corp.'s return on equity of 1.2%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.95%. On the other hand Paramount Skydance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.86 which suggests that it could grow by 9.32%. Given that Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paramount Skydance Corp., analysts believe Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Paramount Skydance Corp..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Skydance Corp. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.424%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Paramount Skydance Corp. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp. pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $857.5M, which are smaller than Paramount Skydance Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is lower than Paramount Skydance Corp.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while Paramount Skydance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.01x versus 0.37x for Paramount Skydance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reading International, Inc. has a net margin of 5.82% compared to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -8.25%. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.97% beat Reading International, Inc.'s return on equity of -729.14%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.95%. On the other hand Reading International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that Reading International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Reading International, Inc. is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings, Inc..

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reading International, Inc. has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.586%.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Reading International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reading International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $857.5M, which are larger than Reading International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $52.2M. Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $49.9M is higher than Reading International, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while Reading International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is 1.01x versus 0.11x for Reading International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.