CNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marcus has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 0.52%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 70.37% beat Marcus's return on equity of -1.69%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand Marcus has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.06%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.143%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Marcus offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus pays out -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $814.3M, which are larger than Marcus quarterly revenues of $188.3M. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $51.3M is higher than Marcus's net income of $986K. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Marcus's PE ratio is 54.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.37x versus 0.71x for Marcus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 18.24%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 70.37% beat Netflix's return on equity of 39.06%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,068.60 which suggests that it could grow by 13.02%. Given that Cinemark Holdings has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Cinemark Holdings is more attractive than Netflix.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.535%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $814.3M, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $51.3M is lower than Netflix's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Netflix's PE ratio is 47.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.37x versus 10.65x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of -2.81%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 70.37% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -32.18%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.81 which suggests that it could grow by 15.17%. Given that Cinemark Holdings has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Cinemark Holdings is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.369%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $814.3M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $8B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $51.3M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of -$224M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.37x versus 0.25x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reading International has a net margin of 6.3% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of -11.51%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 70.37% beat Reading International's return on equity of -195.8%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.46%. On the other hand Reading International has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 101.61%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reading International has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.678%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Reading International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reading International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $814.3M, which are larger than Reading International quarterly revenues of $60.1M. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $51.3M is higher than Reading International's net income of -$6.9M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Reading International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.37x versus 0.13x for Reading International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.