RDI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of 17.46%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 87.97%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 206.85%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Reading International, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Reading International.

Reading International has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.986%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are larger than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Cineverse's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cineverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.14x versus 0.60x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Walt Disney has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of 13.87%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 8.4%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 87.97%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $123.74 which suggests that it could grow by 16.81%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Reading International has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.888%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $23.6B. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 21.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.14x versus 2.05x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of 27.42%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Netflix's return on equity of 40.31%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 87.97%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,096.58 which suggests that it could fall by -3.83%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Netflix.

Reading International has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.582, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.163%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix's PE ratio is 53.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.14x versus 12.43x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of 2.11%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 87.97%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.54 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Reading International has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.824%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.14x versus 0.28x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.