MCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse Corp. has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Marcus Corp.'s net margin of -44.87%. Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7% beat Cineverse Corp.'s return on equity of -2.95%.

Marcus Corp. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 50.58%. On the other hand Cineverse Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 206.12%. Given that Cineverse Corp. has higher upside potential than Marcus Corp., analysts believe Cineverse Corp. is more attractive than Marcus Corp..

Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.575, which suggesting that the stock is 42.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse Corp. has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.127%.

Marcus Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Cineverse Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus Corp. pays 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues are $210.2M, which are larger than Cineverse Corp. quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M is higher than Cineverse Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Marcus Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.73x while Cineverse Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus Corp. is 0.64x versus 0.55x for Cineverse Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Walt Disney Co. has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Marcus Corp.'s net margin of 6.42%. Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7% beat The Walt Disney Co.'s return on equity of 12.22%.

Marcus Corp. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 50.58%. On the other hand The Walt Disney Co. has an analysts' consensus of $132.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Marcus Corp. has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney Co., analysts believe Marcus Corp. is more attractive than The Walt Disney Co..

Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.575, which suggesting that the stock is 42.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney Co. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.464%.

Marcus Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. The Walt Disney Co. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Marcus Corp. pays 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney Co. pays out 14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus Corp.'s is not.

Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues are $210.2M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney Co. quarterly revenues of $22.5B. Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M is lower than The Walt Disney Co.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Marcus Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.73x while The Walt Disney Co.'s PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus Corp. is 0.64x versus 2.03x for The Walt Disney Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia, Inc. has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Marcus Corp.'s net margin of -4.93%. Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7% beat Gaia, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.39%.

Marcus Corp. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 50.58%. On the other hand Gaia, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.63 which suggests that it could grow by 132.47%. Given that Gaia, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus Corp., analysts believe Gaia, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus Corp..

Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.575, which suggesting that the stock is 42.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.691%.

Marcus Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Gaia, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus Corp. pays 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues are $210.2M, which are larger than Gaia, Inc. quarterly revenues of $25M. Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M is higher than Gaia, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Marcus Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.73x while Gaia, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus Corp. is 0.64x versus 0.82x for Gaia, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Skydance Corp. has a net margin of 7.72% compared to Marcus Corp.'s net margin of 2.9%. Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7% beat Paramount Skydance Corp.'s return on equity of 1.2%.

Marcus Corp. has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 50.58%. On the other hand Paramount Skydance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could fall by -1.36%. Given that Marcus Corp. has higher upside potential than Paramount Skydance Corp., analysts believe Marcus Corp. is more attractive than Paramount Skydance Corp..

Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.575, which suggesting that the stock is 42.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Skydance Corp. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.424%.

Marcus Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Paramount Skydance Corp. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Marcus Corp. pays 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp. pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus Corp.'s is not.

Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues are $210.2M, which are smaller than Paramount Skydance Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M is lower than Paramount Skydance Corp.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Marcus Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.73x while Paramount Skydance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus Corp. is 0.64x versus 0.40x for Paramount Skydance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.