MCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Marcus's net margin of 10.34%. Marcus's return on equity of -1.69% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 5.33%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $124.93 which suggests that it could grow by 47.16%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Marcus has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.778%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $24.7B. Marcus's net income of $986K is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 27.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.69x versus 1.67x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Media has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Marcus's net margin of -21.25%. Marcus's return on equity of -1.69% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -0.44%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $97.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38.83%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than Liberty Media, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than Liberty Media.

Marcus has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.221%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Marcus's net income of $986K is higher than Liberty Media's net income of -$248M. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.69x versus 4.68x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Marcus's net margin of -3.29%. Marcus's return on equity of -1.69% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.72%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.38 which suggests that it could grow by 135.25%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Marcus, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Marcus.

Marcus has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.085000000000002%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Marcus's net income of $986K is higher than Gaia's net income of -$803K. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.69x versus 0.92x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Marcus's net margin of -2.81%. Marcus's return on equity of -1.69% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -32.18%.

Marcus has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.80 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Marcus has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.369%.

Marcus has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Marcus pays -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $8B. Marcus's net income of $986K is higher than Paramount Global's net income of -$224M. Notably, Marcus's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.63x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus is 0.69x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.