BILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuit has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 36.37%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Intuit's return on equity of 18.57%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.18, signalling upside risk potential of 45.73%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $788.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.51%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Intuit.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.073%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $7.8B. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Intuit's net income of $2.8B. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.15x versus 11.75x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 20.13%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 18.89%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.18, signalling upside risk potential of 45.73%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $221.15 which suggests that it could grow by 25.33%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Paylocity Holding, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Paylocity Holding.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.792%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $454.5M. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $91.5M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 47.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.15x versus 6.66x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sprout Social has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of -10.27%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Sprout Social's return on equity of -37.29%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.18, signalling upside risk potential of 45.73%. On the other hand Sprout Social has an analysts' consensus of $26.85 which suggests that it could grow by 33.76%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Sprout Social, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Sprout Social.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprout Social has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.877%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sprout Social offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprout Social pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are larger than Sprout Social quarterly revenues of $109.3M. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Sprout Social's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprout Social's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.15x versus 2.75x for Sprout Social. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -3.24% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 3.04%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $62.18, signalling upside risk potential of 45.73%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $297.62 which suggests that it could grow by 25.64%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Workday.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $358.2M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 130.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.15x versus 7.33x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.