MSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -3797.18% compared to Strategy's net margin of 18.49%. Strategy's return on equity of -43.87% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $523.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $320.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Autodesk.

Strategy has a beta of 3.790, which suggesting that the stock is 279.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $111.1M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Strategy's net income of -$4.2B is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 56.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 193.50x versus 10.18x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -3797.18% compared to Strategy's net margin of 36.86%. Strategy's return on equity of -43.87% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $523.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Microsoft.

Strategy has a beta of 3.790, which suggesting that the stock is 279.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $111.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Strategy's net income of -$4.2B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 193.50x versus 12.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -3797.18% compared to Strategy's net margin of 20.78%. Strategy's return on equity of -43.87% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $523.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $178.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.48%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Oracle.

Strategy has a beta of 3.790, which suggesting that the stock is 279.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.667%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $111.1M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Strategy's net income of -$4.2B is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 35.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 193.50x versus 7.70x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clear Secure has a net margin of -3797.18% compared to Strategy's net margin of 12.02%. Strategy's return on equity of -43.87% beat Clear Secure's return on equity of 84.54%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $523.86, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Clear Secure has an analysts' consensus of $29.25 which suggests that it could grow by 21.37%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Clear Secure, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Clear Secure.

Strategy has a beta of 3.790, which suggesting that the stock is 279.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clear Secure has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clear Secure offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clear Secure pays out 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Clear Secure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $111.1M, which are smaller than Clear Secure quarterly revenues of $211.4M. Strategy's net income of -$4.2B is lower than Clear Secure's net income of $25.4M. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clear Secure's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 193.50x versus 2.88x for Clear Secure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.