PLAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -443.46% compared to Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -5.78%. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 494.43%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.779%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $771.6K, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Green Holdings Corp. is 4.45x versus 0.13x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -443.46% compared to Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -8.62%. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.05%. Given that Matthews International Corp. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe Matthews International Corp. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.041%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $771.6K, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $318.8M. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M is higher than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M. Notably, Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Green Holdings Corp. is 4.45x versus 0.59x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NN, Inc. has a net margin of -443.46% compared to Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -6.43%. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99% beat NN, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.02%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NN, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.75 which suggests that it could grow by 319.71%. Given that NN, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe NN, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NN, Inc. has a beta of 2.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.19%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NN, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NN, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $771.6K, which are smaller than NN, Inc. quarterly revenues of $103.9M. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M is higher than NN, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NN, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Green Holdings Corp. is 4.45x versus 0.16x for NN, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of -443.46% compared to Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 4.33%. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Planet Green Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe Planet Green Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.941% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.192%.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $771.6K, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Green Holdings Corp. is 4.45x versus 0.43x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.