NNBR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -6.43% compared to NN, Inc.'s net margin of -5.78%. NN, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.02% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

NN, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 352.76%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 438.46%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than NN, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than NN, Inc..

NN, Inc. has a beta of 2.305, which suggesting that the stock is 130.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.954%.

NN, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NN, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NN, Inc. quarterly revenues are $103.9M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. NN, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, NN, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN, Inc. is 0.15x versus 0.14x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -6.43% compared to NN, Inc.'s net margin of -8.62%. NN, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.02% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43%.

NN, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 352.76%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.02%. Given that NN, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe NN, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

NN, Inc. has a beta of 2.305, which suggesting that the stock is 130.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.406%.

NN, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. NN, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NN, Inc. quarterly revenues are $103.9M, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $318.8M. NN, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is higher than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M. Notably, NN, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN, Inc. is 0.15x versus 0.51x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -6.43% compared to NN, Inc.'s net margin of -443.46%. NN, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.02% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

NN, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 352.76%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NN, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe NN, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

NN, Inc. has a beta of 2.305, which suggesting that the stock is 130.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.432%.

NN, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NN, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NN, Inc. quarterly revenues are $103.9M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. NN, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, NN, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN, Inc. is 0.15x versus 4.05x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of -6.43% compared to NN, Inc.'s net margin of 4.33%. NN, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.02% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

NN, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 352.76%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NN, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe NN, Inc. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

NN, Inc. has a beta of 2.305, which suggesting that the stock is 130.455% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.446%.

NN, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. NN, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NN, Inc. quarterly revenues are $103.9M, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. NN, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, NN, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN, Inc. is 0.15x versus 0.43x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.