HHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compass Diversified Holdings has a net margin of -5.78% compared to Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net margin of 2.17%. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63% beat Compass Diversified Holdings's return on equity of 0.85%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 516.2%. On the other hand Compass Diversified Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 84.94%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Compass Diversified Holdings, analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Compass Diversified Holdings.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass Diversified Holdings has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.444%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compass Diversified Holdings offers a yield of 13.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compass Diversified Holdings pays out 367.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.5M, which are smaller than Compass Diversified Holdings quarterly revenues of $548.7M. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M is lower than Compass Diversified Holdings's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compass Diversified Holdings's PE ratio is 39.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.37x for Compass Diversified Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -5.78% compared to Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net margin of 15.32%. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of 4.8%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 516.2%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.05%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.256%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.5M, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M is lower than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of $43.6M. Notably, Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.60x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

3M Co. has a net margin of -5.78% compared to Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net margin of 9.36%. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63% beat 3M Co.'s return on equity of 73.5%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 516.2%. On the other hand 3M Co. has an analysts' consensus of $178.20 which suggests that it could grow by 6.67%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than 3M Co., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than 3M Co..

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3M Co. has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.58%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 3M Co. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co. pays out 48.63% of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.5M, which are smaller than 3M Co. quarterly revenues of $6.1B. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M is lower than 3M Co.'s net income of $574M. Notably, Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 3M Co.'s PE ratio is 27.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks, Inc. is 0.13x versus 3.63x for 3M Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -5.78% compared to Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net margin of -17648.49%. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63% beat Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 516.2%. On the other hand Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.08 which suggests that it could grow by 65.85%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc..

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.96%.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.5M, which are larger than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365K. Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M is higher than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M. Notably, Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks, Inc. is 0.13x versus 63.16x for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.