SPCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1847 Holdings LLC has a net margin of -17811.89% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of 59.12%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -86.42% beat 1847 Holdings LLC's return on equity of --.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.82, signalling upside risk potential of 191.14%. On the other hand 1847 Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings has higher upside potential than 1847 Holdings LLC, analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings is more attractive than 1847 Holdings LLC.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 2.109, which suggesting that the stock is 110.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1847 Holdings LLC has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.322%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1847 Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1847 Holdings LLC pays out -0.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $429K, which are smaller than 1847 Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$76.4M is lower than 1847 Holdings LLC's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1847 Holdings LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 10.74x versus 0.00x for 1847 Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harte-Hanks has a net margin of -17811.89% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of -5.17%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -86.42% beat Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.82, signalling upside risk potential of 191.14%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 280.44%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 2.109, which suggesting that the stock is 110.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.166%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $429K, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues of $47.1M. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$76.4M is lower than Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 10.74x versus 0.18x for Harte-Hanks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -17811.89% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of -70.61%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -86.42% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.82, signalling upside risk potential of 191.14%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 2.109, which suggesting that the stock is 110.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.065%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $429K, which are smaller than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$76.4M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 10.74x versus 4.41x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -17811.89% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of 6.21%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -86.42% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.82, signalling upside risk potential of 191.14%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings is more attractive than Seaboard.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 2.109, which suggesting that the stock is 110.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.593%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $429K, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$76.4M is lower than Seaboard's net income of $154M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard's PE ratio is 29.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 10.74x versus 0.29x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.