SPCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compass Diversified Holdings has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.17%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Compass Diversified Holdings's return on equity of 0.85%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.08, signalling upside risk potential of 65.85%. On the other hand Compass Diversified Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 84.94%. Given that Compass Diversified Holdings has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Compass Diversified Holdings is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, which suggesting that the stock is 120.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass Diversified Holdings has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.444%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compass Diversified Holdings offers a yield of 13.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compass Diversified Holdings pays out 367.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Compass Diversified Holdings quarterly revenues of $548.7M. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Compass Diversified Holdings's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compass Diversified Holdings's PE ratio is 39.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 63.16x versus 0.37x for Compass Diversified Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -5.78%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.08, signalling upside risk potential of 65.85%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 516.2%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, which suggesting that the stock is 120.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.319%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 63.16x versus 0.13x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 15.32%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of 4.8%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.08, signalling upside risk potential of 65.85%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.05%. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, which suggesting that the stock is 120.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.256%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of $43.6M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 63.16x versus 0.60x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

3M Co. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.36%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat 3M Co.'s return on equity of 73.5%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.08, signalling upside risk potential of 65.85%. On the other hand 3M Co. has an analysts' consensus of $178.20 which suggests that it could grow by 6.67%. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than 3M Co., analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than 3M Co..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, which suggesting that the stock is 120.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3M Co. has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.58%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 3M Co. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co. pays out 48.63% of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than 3M Co. quarterly revenues of $6.1B. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than 3M Co.'s net income of $574M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 3M Co.'s PE ratio is 27.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 63.16x versus 3.63x for 3M Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.