SPCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1847 Holdings LLC has a net margin of -18542.29% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of 59.12%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -81.97% beat 1847 Holdings LLC's return on equity of --.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 122.48%. On the other hand 1847 Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings has higher upside potential than 1847 Holdings LLC, analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings is more attractive than 1847 Holdings LLC.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1847 Holdings LLC has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.71%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1847 Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1847 Holdings LLC pays out -0.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $402K, which are smaller than 1847 Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$74.5M is lower than 1847 Holdings LLC's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1847 Holdings LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 14.50x versus 0.00x for 1847 Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harte-Hanks has a net margin of -18542.29% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of 0.3%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -81.97% beat Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.3%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 122.48%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 223.48%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.874%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $402K, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues of $47.6M. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$74.5M is lower than Harte-Hanks's net income of $142K. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 14.50x versus 0.21x for Harte-Hanks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -18542.29% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of -70.61%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -81.97% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 122.48%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of -0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.103%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $402K, which are smaller than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$74.5M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 14.50x versus 7.88x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -18542.29% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings's net margin of -6.72%. Virgin Galactic Holdings's return on equity of -81.97% beat Seaboard's return on equity of -0.04%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 122.48%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings is more attractive than Seaboard.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a beta of 1.751, which suggesting that the stock is 75.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.355, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.533%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 4.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Virgin Galactic Holdings quarterly revenues are $402K, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Virgin Galactic Holdings's net income of -$74.5M is higher than Seaboard's net income of -$149M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard's PE ratio is 12.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings is 14.50x versus 0.27x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.