SPCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -5.78%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling downside risk potential of -7.46%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 438.46%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.979, which suggesting that the stock is 97.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.954%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 115.28x versus 0.14x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International Corp. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -8.62%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling downside risk potential of -7.46%. On the other hand Matthews International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.02%. Given that Matthews International Corp. has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Matthews International Corp. is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.979, which suggesting that the stock is 97.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.406%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International Corp. offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp. pays out 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues of $318.8M. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 115.28x versus 0.51x for Matthews International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -443.46%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling downside risk potential of -7.46%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.979, which suggesting that the stock is 97.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.432%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 115.28x versus 4.05x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of -17648.49% compared to Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.33%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.16, signalling downside risk potential of -7.46%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.979, which suggesting that the stock is 97.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.446%.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365K, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is 115.28x versus 0.43x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.