MATW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -8.62% compared to Matthews International Corp.'s net margin of -5.78%. Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

Matthews International Corp. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.75%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.7%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.406% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.954%.

Matthews International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International Corp. pays 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues are $318.8M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Matthews International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International Corp. is 0.55x versus 0.15x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NN, Inc. has a net margin of -8.62% compared to Matthews International Corp.'s net margin of -6.43%. Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43% beat NN, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.02%.

Matthews International Corp. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.75%. On the other hand NN, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.75 which suggests that it could grow by 383.19%. Given that NN, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matthews International Corp., analysts believe NN, Inc. is more attractive than Matthews International Corp..

Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.406% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NN, Inc. has a beta of 2.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.455%.

Matthews International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. NN, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International Corp. pays 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. NN, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues are $318.8M, which are larger than NN, Inc. quarterly revenues of $103.9M. Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M is lower than NN, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Matthews International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while NN, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International Corp. is 0.55x versus 0.14x for NN, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -8.62% compared to Matthews International Corp.'s net margin of -443.46%. Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

Matthews International Corp. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.75%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews International Corp. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe Matthews International Corp. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.406% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.432%.

Matthews International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International Corp. pays 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues are $318.8M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M is lower than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Matthews International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International Corp. is 0.55x versus 3.80x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of -8.62% compared to Matthews International Corp.'s net margin of 4.33%. Matthews International Corp.'s return on equity of -5.43% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

Matthews International Corp. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.75%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews International Corp. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe Matthews International Corp. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

Matthews International Corp. has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.406% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.446%.

Matthews International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Matthews International Corp. pays 52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matthews International Corp. quarterly revenues are $318.8M, which are smaller than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Matthews International Corp.'s net income of -$27.5M is lower than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Matthews International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International Corp. is 0.55x versus 0.43x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.