Financhill
Buy
56

CVR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$13.62
Seasonality move :
5.42%
Day range:
$12.56 - $13.81
52-week range:
$8.15 - $16.64
Dividend yield:
0.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.51x
P/B ratio:
0.66x
Volume:
5.1K
Avg. volume:
6.9K
1-year change:
-14.13%
Market cap:
$13.3M
Revenue:
$27M
EPS (TTM):
-$3.66

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
-- -- -- -- --
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
$38M -$0.14 -22.2% -1.3% $5.00
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
$594.1M $0.61 -14.08% 595.36% $32.00
NPO
Enpro, Inc.
$276.6M $1.96 8.55% 191.8% $249.00
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
$417.3M $0.83 3.73% 82.43% --
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
$604M $0.08 27.92% 71.57% $61.42
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
$13.74 -- $13.3M -- $0.03 0.87% 0.51x
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
$3.73 $5.00 $359.8M 75.05x $0.00 0% 1.27x
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
$31.66 $32.00 $2.2B 52.06x $0.23 2.85% 0.84x
NPO
Enpro, Inc.
$223.90 $249.00 $4.7B 55.00x $0.31 0.55% 4.30x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
$21.09 -- $303.8M 10.18x $0.13 2.37% 0.18x
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
$57.99 $61.42 $6.6B -- $0.00 0% 2.80x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
4.52% 0.940 9.39% 2.97x
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
16.56% 2.200 30.25% 7.09x
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
53.95% 2.376 83.57% 0.74x
NPO
Enpro, Inc.
23.09% 2.459 9.59% 1.46x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
65.45% 0.982 227.52% 1.09x
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
12.52% 5.038 0.5% 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
$1.3M $64.6K -16.63% -17% 0.88% $492.1K
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
$12.6M -$6.4M 0.84% 0.99% -10.81% $3.5M
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
$203.6M $56.7M 1.57% 3.72% 8.7% $58.6M
NPO
Enpro, Inc.
$120.2M $44M 4.2% 5.87% 15.35% $52.1M
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
$66.6M $20.1M 2.5% 7.37% 5.04% $6.4M
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
$119.5M -$14.4M -20.12% -21.35% -2.33% $494.4M

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or ACTG?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of -4.03%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    18.06% $0.07 $21M
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    21.2% -$0.03 $683.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or ACTG?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acacia Research Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.05%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0 0 0
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1 0 0
  • Is CVR or ACTG More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.931%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or ACTG?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Acacia Research Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or ACTG?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues of $59.4M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is higher than Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acacia Research Corp.'s PE ratio is 75.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 1.27x for Acacia Research Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0.51x -- $7.4M $67.6K
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1.27x 75.05x $59.4M -$2.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or HI?

    Hillenbrand, Inc. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of 11.92%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    18.06% $0.07 $21M
    HI
    Hillenbrand, Inc.
    31.23% $1.07 $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or HI?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hillenbrand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.07%. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0 0 0
    HI
    Hillenbrand, Inc.
    0 2 0
  • Is CVR or HI More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.355%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or HI?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Hillenbrand, Inc. offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays out 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hillenbrand, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or HI?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $652M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is lower than Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hillenbrand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 0.84x for Hillenbrand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0.51x -- $7.4M $67.6K
    HI
    Hillenbrand, Inc.
    0.84x 52.06x $652M $77.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or NPO?

    Enpro, Inc. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of 7.54%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Enpro, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    18.06% $0.07 $21M
    NPO
    Enpro, Inc.
    41.94% $1.01 $2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or NPO?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enpro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $249.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.21%. Given that Enpro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Enpro, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0 0 0
    NPO
    Enpro, Inc.
    2 0 0
  • Is CVR or NPO More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.432%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or NPO?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Enpro, Inc. offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro, Inc. pays out 34.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or NPO?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Enpro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is lower than Enpro, Inc.'s net income of $21.6M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enpro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 4.30x for Enpro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0.51x -- $7.4M $67.6K
    NPO
    Enpro, Inc.
    4.30x 55.00x $286.6M $21.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or PKOH?

    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of 1.23%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    18.06% $0.07 $21M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
    16.71% $0.39 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or PKOH?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.51%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0 0 0
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
    0 1 0
  • Is CVR or PKOH More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.351%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or PKOH?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or PKOH?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 0.18x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0.51x -- $7.4M $67.6K
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
    0.18x 10.18x $398.6M $4.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns CVR or SYM?

    Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of -3.1%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    18.06% $0.07 $21M
    SYM
    Symbotic, Inc.
    19.33% -$0.03 $514.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About CVR or SYM?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.42 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0 0 0
    SYM
    Symbotic, Inc.
    6 10 2
  • Is CVR or SYM More Risky?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.21% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CVR or SYM?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CVR or SYM?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 2.80x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0.51x -- $7.4M $67.6K
    SYM
    Symbotic, Inc.
    2.80x -- $618.5M -$19.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock