CVR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of 11.92%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hillenbrand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.35%. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.546%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Hillenbrand, Inc. offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays out 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hillenbrand, Inc.'s is not.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $652M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is lower than Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hillenbrand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 0.84x for Hillenbrand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of 1.23%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -30.27%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.041%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 0.19x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of -3.1%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.74%. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 2.72x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xerox Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net margin of -3.6%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17% beat Xerox Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -98.89%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xerox Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 83.82%. Given that Xerox Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Xerox Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 93.122% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xerox Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.552%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Xerox Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 9.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings Corp. pays out 10.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Xerox Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K is higher than Xerox Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$73M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xerox Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is 0.51x versus 0.04x for Xerox Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.