ACTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand has a net margin of -60.04% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of 1.74%. Acacia Research's return on equity of 9.12% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.19%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.21%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Hillenbrand.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.771%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Acacia Research pays 2.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $837.6M. Acacia Research's net income of -$14M is lower than Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.38x while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 39.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 2.67x versus 0.66x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro has a net margin of -60.04% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of 7.59%. Acacia Research's return on equity of 9.12% beat Enpro's return on equity of 3.78%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.19%. On the other hand Enpro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.08%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Enpro.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.654%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enpro offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Acacia Research pays 2.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro pays out 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Enpro's is not.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Enpro quarterly revenues of $260.9M. Acacia Research's net income of -$14M is lower than Enpro's net income of $19.8M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.38x while Enpro's PE ratio is 67.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 2.67x versus 3.51x for Enpro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -60.04% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of 2.35%. Acacia Research's return on equity of 9.12% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.19%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.48%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.382%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Acacia Research pays 2.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Acacia Research's net income of -$14M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.38x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 20.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 2.67x versus 0.20x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of -60.04% compared to Acacia Research's net margin of 0.5%. Acacia Research's return on equity of 9.12% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Acacia Research has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.19%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.01%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Symbotic.

Acacia Research has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acacia Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acacia Research pays 2.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Acacia Research's net income of -$14M is lower than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Acacia Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.38x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research is 2.67x versus 1.28x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.