ACTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of 11.92%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.69%. On the other hand Hillenbrand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.88%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, Inc., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Hillenbrand, Inc..

Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.546%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hillenbrand, Inc. offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays out 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $652M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.25x while Hillenbrand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.27x versus 0.84x for Hillenbrand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro, Inc. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of 7.54%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Enpro, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.69%. On the other hand Enpro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $249.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.29%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Enpro, Inc., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Enpro, Inc..

Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro, Inc. has a beta of 1.588, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.784%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enpro, Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro, Inc. pays out 34.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Enpro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Enpro, Inc.'s net income of $21.6M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.25x while Enpro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.27x versus 4.11x for Enpro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of 1.23%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.69%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -25.98%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.041%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.25x while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.27x versus 0.18x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of -3.1%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.69%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.42 which suggests that it could grow by 1.91%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Symbotic, Inc..

Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.25x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.27x versus 2.92x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.