Financhill
Sell
43

ACTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$3.77
Seasonality move :
7.55%
Day range:
$3.60 - $3.79
52-week range:
$2.70 - $4.53
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
75.65x
P/S ratio:
1.28x
P/B ratio:
0.67x
Volume:
194.7K
Avg. volume:
196.5K
1-year change:
-11.74%
Market cap:
$362.7M
Revenue:
$122.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.05

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
$38M -$0.14 -22.2% -1.3% $5.00
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
-- -- -- -- --
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
$607.1M $0.63 -14.08% 595.36% $32.00
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
$402.9M $0.74 3.73% 82.43% --
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
$622.6M $0.09 27.92% 71.57% $61.42
XRX
Xerox Holdings Corp.
$2.1B $0.29 27.28% -98.18% $3.75
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
$3.76 $5.00 $362.7M 75.65x $0.00 0% 1.28x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
$14.30 -- $13.8M -- $0.03 0.84% 0.53x
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
$31.79 $32.00 $2.2B 52.28x $0.23 2.84% 0.84x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
$21.82 -- $314.3M 10.53x $0.13 2.29% 0.19x
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
$70.61 $61.42 $8B -- $0.00 0% 3.42x
XRX
Xerox Holdings Corp.
$2.55 $3.75 $325.9M -- $0.03 7.86% 0.05x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
16.56% 2.308 30.25% 7.09x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
4.52% 0.316 9.39% 2.97x
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
53.95% 2.315 83.57% 0.74x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
65.45% 0.544 227.52% 1.09x
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
12.52% 5.268 0.5% 0.93x
XRX
Xerox Holdings Corp.
89.14% 3.064 669.25% 0.70x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACTG
Acacia Research Corp.
$12.6M -$6.4M 0.84% 0.99% -10.81% $3.5M
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
$1.3M $64.6K -16.63% -17% 0.88% $492.1K
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
$203.6M $56.7M 1.57% 3.72% 8.7% $58.6M
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
$66.6M $20.1M 2.5% 7.37% 5.04% $6.4M
SYM
Symbotic, Inc.
$119.5M -$14.4M -20.12% -21.35% -2.33% $494.4M
XRX
Xerox Holdings Corp.
$415M -$136M -19.15% -80.6% -6.94% $88M

Acacia Research Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACTG or CVR?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of 0.92%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    21.2% -$0.03 $683.5M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    18.06% $0.07 $21M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACTG or CVR?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1 0 0
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0 0 0
  • Is ACTG or CVR More Risky?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.122%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACTG or CVR?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACTG or CVR?

    Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.65x while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.28x versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1.28x 75.65x $59.4M -$2.4M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
    0.53x -- $7.4M $67.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns ACTG or HI?

    Hillenbrand, Inc. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of 11.92%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    21.2% -$0.03 $683.5M
    HI
    Hillenbrand, Inc.
    31.23% $1.07 $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACTG or HI?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Hillenbrand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.66%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, Inc., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Hillenbrand, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1 0 0
    HI
    Hillenbrand, Inc.
    0 2 0
  • Is ACTG or HI More Risky?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.546%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACTG or HI?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hillenbrand, Inc. offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays out 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACTG or HI?

    Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $652M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.65x while Hillenbrand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.28x versus 0.84x for Hillenbrand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1.28x 75.65x $59.4M -$2.4M
    HI
    Hillenbrand, Inc.
    0.84x 52.28x $652M $77.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACTG or PKOH?

    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of 1.23%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    21.2% -$0.03 $683.5M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
    16.71% $0.39 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACTG or PKOH?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -28.96%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1 0 0
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
    0 1 0
  • Is ACTG or PKOH More Risky?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.041%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACTG or PKOH?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACTG or PKOH?

    Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.65x while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.28x versus 0.19x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1.28x 75.65x $59.4M -$2.4M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
    0.19x 10.53x $398.6M $4.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACTG or SYM?

    Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of -3.1%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    21.2% -$0.03 $683.5M
    SYM
    Symbotic, Inc.
    19.33% -$0.03 $514.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACTG or SYM?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.42 which suggests that it could fall by -13.01%. Given that Acacia Research Corp. has higher upside potential than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Acacia Research Corp. is more attractive than Symbotic, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1 0 0
    SYM
    Symbotic, Inc.
    6 10 2
  • Is ACTG or SYM More Risky?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACTG or SYM?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACTG or SYM?

    Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.65x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.28x versus 3.42x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1.28x 75.65x $59.4M -$2.4M
    SYM
    Symbotic, Inc.
    3.42x -- $618.5M -$19.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACTG or XRX?

    Xerox Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -4.03% compared to Acacia Research Corp.'s net margin of -38.76%. Acacia Research Corp.'s return on equity of 0.99% beat Xerox Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -80.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    21.2% -$0.03 $683.5M
    XRX
    Xerox Holdings Corp.
    21.16% -$6.02 $5.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACTG or XRX?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Xerox Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 44.79%. Given that Xerox Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Acacia Research Corp., analysts believe Xerox Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Acacia Research Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1 0 0
    XRX
    Xerox Holdings Corp.
    0 2 0
  • Is ACTG or XRX More Risky?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xerox Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.552%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACTG or XRX?

    Acacia Research Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xerox Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 7.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Acacia Research Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings Corp. pays out 10.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACTG or XRX?

    Acacia Research Corp. quarterly revenues are $59.4M, which are smaller than Xerox Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. Acacia Research Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Xerox Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$760M. Notably, Acacia Research Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.65x while Xerox Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acacia Research Corp. is 1.28x versus 0.05x for Xerox Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACTG
    Acacia Research Corp.
    1.28x 75.65x $59.4M -$2.4M
    XRX
    Xerox Holdings Corp.
    0.05x -- $2B -$760M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?

2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…

Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?

Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10

Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.

Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 10

Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.

Sell
50
NAIL alert for Jan 10

Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock