NPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of -20.76%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Enpro has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.839%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.49x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.46x versus 0.50x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hillenbrand has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of 1.74%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.09%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Enpro.

Enpro has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.771%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $837.6M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.49x while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 39.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.46x versus 0.67x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of 2.35%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.27%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Enpro has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.382%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Enpro's is not.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.49x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 20.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.46x versus 0.20x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of 0.5%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Enpro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.62%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Enpro.

Enpro has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.49x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.46x versus 1.37x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.