GRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of -82.25%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.45%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9758283.83%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Gorman-Rupp, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Gorman-Rupp.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.9M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.99x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.56x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 18.56%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.45%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.492%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $24.9M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.9M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.99x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 23.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.56x versus 4.16x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standex International has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 10.68%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Standex International's return on equity of 11.64%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.45%. On the other hand Standex International has an analysts' consensus of $217.90 which suggests that it could grow by 14.69%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Standex International, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Standex International.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standex International has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.835%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Standex International offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Standex International pays out 19.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are smaller than Standex International quarterly revenues of $170.5M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.9M is lower than Standex International's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.99x while Standex International's PE ratio is 31.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.56x versus 3.20x for Standex International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 10.31%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 10.73% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.45%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 26.1%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Xylem, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Xylem.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.053%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $168.2M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.9M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.99x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.56x versus 3.38x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.