TKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Gorman-Rupp Co. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 6.56%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat The Gorman-Rupp Co.'s return on equity of 13.04%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $90.76, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand The Gorman-Rupp Co. has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.25%. Given that The Gorman-Rupp Co. has higher upside potential than The Timken Co., analysts believe The Gorman-Rupp Co. is more attractive than The Timken Co..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Gorman-Rupp Co. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.558%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. The Gorman-Rupp Co. offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. The Gorman-Rupp Co. pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than The Gorman-Rupp Co. quarterly revenues of $172.8M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than The Gorman-Rupp Co.'s net income of $11.3M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while The Gorman-Rupp Co.'s PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.45x versus 2.00x for The Gorman-Rupp Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 13.81%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.64%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $90.76, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.16%. Given that Mueller Water Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Timken Co., analysts believe Mueller Water Products, Inc. is more attractive than The Timken Co..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products, Inc. has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.786%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Mueller Water Products, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products, Inc. pays out 22.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Mueller Water Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $380.8M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s net income of $52.6M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.45x versus 2.90x for Mueller Water Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 14.98%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat Omega Flex, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.08%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $90.76, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand Omega Flex, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Timken Co. has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, Inc., analysts believe The Timken Co. is more attractive than Omega Flex, Inc..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex, Inc. has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.607%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Omega Flex, Inc. offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc. pays out 75.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Omega Flex, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.2M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than Omega Flex, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while Omega Flex, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.45x versus 3.28x for Omega Flex, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 13.18%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat RBC Bearings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.55%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $90.76, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand RBC Bearings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $512.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.78%. Given that RBC Bearings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Timken Co., analysts believe RBC Bearings, Inc. is more attractive than The Timken Co..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.922% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.715%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. RBC Bearings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Timken Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than RBC Bearings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $455.3M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than RBC Bearings, Inc.'s net income of $60M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while RBC Bearings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 60.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.45x versus 9.11x for RBC Bearings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.