TKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of -55.83%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s return on equity of -257.58%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $88.49, signalling upside risk potential of 2.87%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 230769592.34%. Given that Hyperscale Data, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Timken Co., analysts believe Hyperscale Data, Inc. is more attractive than The Timken Co..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.719% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a beta of 2.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.109%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Hyperscale Data, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc. pays out 8.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.3M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s net income of -$13.6M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.35x while Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.33x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 14.98%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat Omega Flex, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.08%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $88.49, signalling upside risk potential of 2.87%. On the other hand Omega Flex, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Timken Co. has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, Inc., analysts believe The Timken Co. is more attractive than Omega Flex, Inc..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.719% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex, Inc. has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.264%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Omega Flex, Inc. offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc. pays out 75.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Omega Flex, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.2M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than Omega Flex, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.35x while Omega Flex, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.33x versus 2.96x for Omega Flex, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 13.18%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat RBC Bearings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.55%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $88.49, signalling upside risk potential of 2.87%. On the other hand RBC Bearings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $482.83 which suggests that it could grow by 5.34%. Given that RBC Bearings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Timken Co., analysts believe RBC Bearings, Inc. is more attractive than The Timken Co..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.719% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings, Inc. has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.778%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. RBC Bearings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Timken Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than RBC Bearings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $455.3M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than RBC Bearings, Inc.'s net income of $60M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.35x while RBC Bearings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.33x versus 8.37x for RBC Bearings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 6.42% compared to The Timken Co.'s net margin of 1.54%. The Timken Co.'s return on equity of 10.38% beat Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.7%.

The Timken Co. has a consensus price target of $88.49, signalling upside risk potential of 2.87%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 33.93%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Timken Co., analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is more attractive than The Timken Co..

The Timken Co. has a beta of 1.217, which suggesting that the stock is 21.719% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.907%.

The Timken Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. The Timken Co. pays 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays out 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend. The Timken Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s is not.

The Timken Co. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $124.7M. The Timken Co.'s net income of $74.3M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, The Timken Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.35x while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 45.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken Co. is 1.33x versus 0.96x for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.