TKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 6.63% compared to The Timken's net margin of -82.25%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.19% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $91.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.89%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23230034.96%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.891%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. The Timken's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. The Timken's net income of $71.2M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.17x versus 0.01x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 6.63% compared to The Timken's net margin of 17.36%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.19% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $91.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.89%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than Omega Flex.

The Timken has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.726%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $27M. The Timken's net income of $71.2M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.17x versus 3.94x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 6.63% compared to The Timken's net margin of 14.68%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.19% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.35%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $91.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.89%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $390.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

The Timken has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.858%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $394.4M. The Timken's net income of $71.2M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $57.9M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 46.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.17x versus 6.25x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 6.63% compared to The Timken's net margin of 1.44%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.19% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $91.20, signalling upside risk potential of 20.89%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 40.3%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.372% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.14%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. The Timken's net income of $71.2M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.17x versus 0.90x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.