HI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of -20.76%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.21%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.839%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $837.6M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.69x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.66x versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 12.78%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.21%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.98%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings PLC, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings PLC.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.685%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $837.6M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $99.4M. Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M is higher than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.69x while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 38.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.66x versus 0.92x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 2.35%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.21%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.48%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.382%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $837.6M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.69x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 20.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.66x versus 0.20x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 0.5%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.21%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.01%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Hillenbrand.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $837.6M, which are larger than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M is higher than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.69x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.66x versus 1.28x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.