HI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of -20.76%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -14.37% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.57%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.489% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.163, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.682%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $706.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Hillenbrand's net income of $6.4M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.48x versus 0.35x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 17.57%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -14.37% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.57%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $218.49 which suggests that it could grow by 20.27%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.489% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $706.9M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Hillenbrand's net income of $6.4M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.48x versus 4.34x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of 0.13%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -14.37% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 10.13%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.57%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.47%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.489% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.068%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $706.9M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $388.4M. Hillenbrand's net income of $6.4M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $500K. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.48x versus 0.16x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Hillenbrand's net margin of -0.71%. Hillenbrand's return on equity of -14.37% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.04%.

Hillenbrand has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 74.57%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.76 which suggests that it could grow by 63.63%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Symbotic.

Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.489% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hillenbrand has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hillenbrand pays -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand quarterly revenues are $706.9M, which are larger than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $486.7M. Hillenbrand's net income of $6.4M is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Hillenbrand's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand is 0.48x versus 1.09x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.