HI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.21%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hillenbrand, Inc.'s is not.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $652M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.11x while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.84x versus 0.52x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro, Inc. has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of 7.54%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72% beat Enpro, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand Enpro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $249.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.94%. Given that Enpro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, Inc., analysts believe Enpro, Inc. is more attractive than Hillenbrand, Inc..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.432%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Enpro, Inc. offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro, Inc. pays out 34.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hillenbrand, Inc.'s is not.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $652M, which are larger than Enpro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M is higher than Enpro, Inc.'s net income of $21.6M. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.11x while Enpro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.84x versus 4.31x for Enpro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of 1.23%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.89%. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.351%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hillenbrand, Inc.'s is not.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $652M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.11x while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.84x versus 0.19x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of -3.1%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.72% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.42 which suggests that it could grow by 5.37%. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, Inc., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Hillenbrand, Inc..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.394, which suggesting that the stock is 39.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $652M, which are larger than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $77.7M is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.11x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.84x versus 2.82x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.