HI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.78% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.14%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.146, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.369%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 30.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $599.3M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $4.1M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.78x versus 0.33x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro, Inc. has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of 7.54%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.78% beat Enpro, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.14%. On the other hand Enpro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $249.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.65%. Given that Enpro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hillenbrand, Inc., analysts believe Enpro, Inc. is more attractive than Hillenbrand, Inc..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro, Inc. has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.602%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Enpro, Inc. offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 30.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro, Inc. pays out 34.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $599.3M, which are larger than Enpro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $4.1M is lower than Enpro, Inc.'s net income of $21.6M. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Enpro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.78x versus 4.03x for Enpro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of 1.23%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.78% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.14%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -23.91%. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.873%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 30.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $599.3M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $4.1M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.78x versus 0.18x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net margin of -5.39%. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.78% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.98%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.14%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $50.82 which suggests that it could fall by -12.64%. Given that Hillenbrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Hillenbrand, Inc. is more attractive than Symbotic, Inc..

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hillenbrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hillenbrand, Inc. pays 30.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hillenbrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $599.3M, which are larger than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $592.1M. Hillenbrand, Inc.'s net income of $4.1M is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$31.9M. Notably, Hillenbrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.24x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hillenbrand, Inc. is 0.78x versus 2.85x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.