YHGJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -46.97% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of 3.8%. Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -5.58%.

Yunhong Green CTI has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 723.53%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.66999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.269%.

Yunhong Green CTI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Yunhong Green CTI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Yunhong Green CTI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yunhong Green CTI is 1.01x versus 0.43x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -46.97% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of -23.71%. Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

Yunhong Green CTI has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 723.53%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 228.95%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Commercial Vehicle Group, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Commercial Vehicle Group.

Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.66999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.501%.

Yunhong Green CTI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yunhong Green CTI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, Yunhong Green CTI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yunhong Green CTI is 1.01x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -46.97% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of --. Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Yunhong Green CTI has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 723.53%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.03%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.66999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Yunhong Green CTI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yunhong Green CTI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Yunhong Green CTI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yunhong Green CTI is 1.01x versus 140.11x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -46.97% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of --. Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Yunhong Green CTI has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 723.53%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Northann.

Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, which suggesting that the stock is 0.66999999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Yunhong Green CTI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yunhong Green CTI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Yunhong Green CTI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yunhong Green CTI is 1.01x versus 0.37x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.