AMWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 4.17% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of --. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.05% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $91.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.83%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.582, which suggesting that the stock is 58.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $397.6M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. American Woodmark's net income of $16.6M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.05x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.52x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of 4.17% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of 1.54%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.05% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $91.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.83%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 24.09%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.582, which suggesting that the stock is 58.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.69%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $397.6M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. American Woodmark's net income of $16.6M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.05x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 38.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.52x versus 0.14x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterBrand has a net margin of 4.17% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of 2.1%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.05% beat MasterBrand's return on equity of 10.05%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $91.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.83%. On the other hand MasterBrand has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.26%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than MasterBrand, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than MasterBrand.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.582, which suggesting that the stock is 58.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasterBrand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasterBrand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $397.6M, which are smaller than MasterBrand quarterly revenues of $667.7M. American Woodmark's net income of $16.6M is higher than MasterBrand's net income of $14M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.05x while MasterBrand's PE ratio is 13.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.52x versus 0.65x for MasterBrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 4.17% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of -46.97%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.05% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $91.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.83%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 723.53%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than American Woodmark, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than American Woodmark.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.582, which suggesting that the stock is 58.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $397.6M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. American Woodmark's net income of $16.6M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.05x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.52x versus 1.01x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.