ETD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of 3.8%. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 12.82% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -5.58%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.75%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.269%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $15M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.10x versus 0.40x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of 8.35%. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 12.82% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 13.18%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.3%. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.3%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $108.5M. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $15M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.10x versus 0.51x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keller Manufacturing has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of --. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 12.82% beat Keller Manufacturing's return on equity of --.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Keller Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ethan Allen Interiors has higher upside potential than Keller Manufacturing, analysts believe Ethan Allen Interiors is more attractive than Keller Manufacturing.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keller Manufacturing has a beta of 2.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.496%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Keller Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Keller Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Keller Manufacturing quarterly revenues of --. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $15M is higher than Keller Manufacturing's net income of --. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while Keller Manufacturing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.10x versus -- for Keller Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La-Z-Boy has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of 5.45%. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 12.82% beat La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand La-Z-Boy has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.89%. Given that La-Z-Boy has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, analysts believe La-Z-Boy is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.645%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. La-Z-Boy offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy pays out 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are smaller than La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues of $521.8M. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $15M is lower than La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.32x while La-Z-Boy's PE ratio is 13.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.10x versus 0.78x for La-Z-Boy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.