ETD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of -5.96%. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 13.42% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -9.56%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.18%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.196%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $14.7M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.38x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.13x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of 3.98%. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 13.42% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.56%. Given that Ethan Allen Interiors has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe Ethan Allen Interiors is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.64%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $104M. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $14.7M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.38x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.13x versus 0.68x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of -3.96%. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 13.42% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48.59%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.064%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 6.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $104.4M. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $14.7M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.38x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.13x versus 0.37x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keller Manufacturing has a net margin of 9.54% compared to Ethan Allen Interiors's net margin of --. Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 13.42% beat Keller Manufacturing's return on equity of --.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Keller Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ethan Allen Interiors has higher upside potential than Keller Manufacturing, analysts believe Ethan Allen Interiors is more attractive than Keller Manufacturing.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keller Manufacturing has a beta of 1.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.854%.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Keller Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ethan Allen Interiors pays 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Keller Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues are $154.3M, which are larger than Keller Manufacturing quarterly revenues of --. Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $14.7M is higher than Keller Manufacturing's net income of --. Notably, Ethan Allen Interiors's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.38x while Keller Manufacturing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ethan Allen Interiors is 1.13x versus -- for Keller Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.