MBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 2.59% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.23% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.65%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.66%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than MasterBrand, Inc., analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. is more attractive than MasterBrand, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.187%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $698.9M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.53x versus 0.40x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 2.59% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of 6.63%. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.23% beat Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.32%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.65%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.83%. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.821%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. pays out 20% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $698.9M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $110.4M. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.3M. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.53x versus 0.50x for Flexsteel Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.59% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of -116.03%. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.23% beat Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -217.62%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.65%. On the other hand Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $698.9M, which are larger than Marwynn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3M. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.53x versus 1.39x for Marwynn Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 2.59% compared to MasterBrand, Inc.'s net margin of --. MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.23% beat Regional Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.65%. On the other hand Regional Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Regional Brands, Inc..

MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.183%.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. MasterBrand, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $698.9M, which are larger than Regional Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M is higher than Regional Brands, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, MasterBrand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.48x while Regional Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterBrand, Inc. is 0.53x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.