MWYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -116.03% compared to Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -217.62% beat Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.68%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.66%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings, Inc..

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.187%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. pays out 68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s net income of $801K. Notably, Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.40x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -116.03% compared to Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.63%. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -217.62% beat Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.32%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.83%. Given that Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings, Inc..

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.821%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. pays out 20% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Flexsteel Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $110.4M. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.3M. Notably, Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexsteel Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.50x for Flexsteel Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterBrand, Inc. has a net margin of -116.03% compared to Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.59%. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -217.62% beat MasterBrand, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.23%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MasterBrand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.65%. Given that MasterBrand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, Inc., analysts believe MasterBrand, Inc. is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings, Inc..

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterBrand, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasterBrand, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasterBrand, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than MasterBrand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $698.9M. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than MasterBrand, Inc.'s net income of $18.1M. Notably, Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MasterBrand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.53x for MasterBrand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands, Inc. has a net margin of -116.03% compared to Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -217.62% beat Regional Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regional Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, Inc., analysts believe Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Regional Brands, Inc..

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.183%.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. Marwynn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marwynn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are larger than Regional Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is higher than Regional Brands, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Marwynn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regional Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.