HYLN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of -1757.18% compared to Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 14.64%. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.55%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.17%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, which suggesting that the stock is 150.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $759K, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyliion Holdings Corp. is 77.32x versus 1.23x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a net margin of -1757.18% compared to Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -4.47%. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4% beat Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.55%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.56%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc..

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, which suggesting that the stock is 150.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.799%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $759K, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.5M. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyliion Holdings Corp. is 77.32x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products, Inc. has a net margin of -1757.18% compared to Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 14.06%. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4% beat Dorman Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.31%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.55%. On the other hand Dorman Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $173.50 which suggests that it could grow by 34.6%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Dorman Products, Inc..

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, which suggesting that the stock is 150.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.563%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $759K, which are smaller than Dorman Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $543.7M. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M is lower than Dorman Products, Inc.'s net income of $76.4M. Notably, Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dorman Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyliion Holdings Corp. is 77.32x versus 1.87x for Dorman Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of -1757.18% compared to Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -38.63%. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.55%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 725.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings Corp., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings Corp..

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, which suggesting that the stock is 150.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $759K, which are smaller than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M is lower than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyliion Holdings Corp. is 77.32x versus 0.43x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.