CVGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products, Inc. has a net margin of -4.14% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of 2.15%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.95% beat Dorman Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.61%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 85.98%. On the other hand Dorman Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $156.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.07%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Dorman Products, Inc..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.835%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $154.8M, which are smaller than Dorman Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $537.9M. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M is lower than Dorman Products, Inc.'s net income of $11.6M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Dorman Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.12x versus 1.48x for Dorman Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro, Inc. has a net margin of -4.14% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of 3.8%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.95% beat Monro, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.03%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 85.98%. On the other hand Monro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.63 which suggests that it could grow by 65.75%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monro, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Monro, Inc..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro, Inc. has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.068%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro, Inc. offers a yield of 7.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro, Inc. pays out 673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $154.8M, which are smaller than Monro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $293.4M. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M is lower than Monro, Inc.'s net income of $11.1M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Monro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.12x versus 0.40x for Monro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing Co. has a net margin of -4.14% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of -5.81%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.95% beat Modine Manufacturing Co.'s return on equity of 10%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 85.98%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $251.14 which suggests that it could grow by 30.85%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Modine Manufacturing Co., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Modine Manufacturing Co..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing Co. has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.731%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Modine Manufacturing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $154.8M, which are smaller than Modine Manufacturing Co. quarterly revenues of $805M. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.4M is higher than Modine Manufacturing Co.'s net income of -$46.8M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Modine Manufacturing Co.'s PE ratio is 106.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.12x versus 3.58x for Modine Manufacturing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.