CVGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -4.47% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings Corp., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings Corp..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, which suggesting that the stock is 95.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.08x versus 81.82x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro, Inc. has a net margin of -4.47% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.96%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57% beat Monro, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.05%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Monro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.67 which suggests that it could fall by -15.06%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monro, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Monro, Inc..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, which suggesting that the stock is 95.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro, Inc. has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro, Inc. offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro, Inc. pays out 673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are smaller than Monro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $288.9M. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M is lower than Monro, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Monro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.08x versus 0.54x for Monro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has a net margin of -4.47% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of -0.97%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57% beat Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.95%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.26%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, which suggesting that the stock is 95.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.319%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. quarterly revenues of $221.5M. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M is lower than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s PE ratio is 106.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.08x versus 0.31x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sypris Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -4.47% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.75%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57% beat Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.13%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Sypris Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -46.12%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sypris Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Sypris Solutions, Inc..

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, which suggesting that the stock is 95.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sypris Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.25%.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sypris Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sypris Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.5M, which are larger than Sypris Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.7M. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M is lower than Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $501K. Notably, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.77x while Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is 0.08x versus 0.42x for Sypris Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.