WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of -25.36%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $196.81 which suggests that it could grow by 9.88%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.692%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$3.9B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.52x versus 1.74x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of 3.86%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.61%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.761%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.52x versus 0.52x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of 3.43%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 37.32%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.656%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $197.3M. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 28.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.52x versus 1.14x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 11.27% compared to Woodward's net margin of 9.07%. Woodward's return on equity of 16.72% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.13, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.04%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $772.7M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $981M. Woodward's net income of $87.1M is lower than Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.52x while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 42.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.52x versus 2.77x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.