WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 19.35%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.08% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 44.62%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $417.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.22%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $357.35 which suggests that it could grow by 13.91%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.099999999999989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.683%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $996.5M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $133.7M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.07x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 38.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 6.32x versus 7.31x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 18.43%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.08% beat Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.17%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $417.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.22%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.89%. Given that Woodward, Inc. has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, Inc., analysts believe Woodward, Inc. is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.099999999999989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.192%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. pays out 9.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $996.5M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $133.7M is lower than Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s net income of $385M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.07x while Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 6.32x versus 11.77x for Howmet Aerospace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 31.97%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.08% beat Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.01%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $417.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.22%. On the other hand Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.099999999999989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.76%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $996.5M, which are larger than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.2M. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $133.7M is higher than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.07x while Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 6.32x versus 4.01x for Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group, Inc. has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 16.89%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.08% beat TransDigm Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $417.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.22%. On the other hand TransDigm Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,594.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.19%. Given that TransDigm Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe TransDigm Group, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.099999999999989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.226%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. TransDigm Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $90.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $996.5M, which are smaller than TransDigm Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $133.7M is lower than TransDigm Group, Inc.'s net income of $386M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.07x while TransDigm Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 6.32x versus 8.46x for TransDigm Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.