WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Boeing Co. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of -22.94%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat The Boeing Co.'s return on equity of --.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $331.63, signalling upside risk potential of 4.89%. On the other hand The Boeing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $244.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.78%. Given that The Boeing Co. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe The Boeing Co. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Boeing Co. has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.717%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. The Boeing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. The Boeing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than The Boeing Co. quarterly revenues of $23.3B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than The Boeing Co.'s net income of -$5.3B. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while The Boeing Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.44x versus 2.01x for The Boeing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 7.5%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.31%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $331.63, signalling upside risk potential of 4.89%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.90 which suggests that it could grow by 35.47%. Given that Leonardo DRS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe Leonardo DRS, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS, Inc. has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.161%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Leonardo DRS, Inc. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are larger than Leonardo DRS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $960M. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s net income of $72M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.44x versus 2.61x for Leonardo DRS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 17.82%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 41.61%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $331.63, signalling upside risk potential of 4.89%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $344.71 which suggests that it could grow by 9.25%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.993%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 42.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.44x versus 7.71x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 31.97%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.01%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $331.63, signalling upside risk potential of 4.89%. On the other hand Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.17 which suggests that it could grow by 1.25%. Given that Woodward, Inc. has higher upside potential than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc., analysts believe Woodward, Inc. is more attractive than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.342%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are larger than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.2M. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.95x while Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.44x versus 4.00x for Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.