WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of -0.19%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.68%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $196.79 which suggests that it could grow by 6.05%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.611%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.37x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.56x versus 1.82x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 5.42%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.68%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $80.60 which suggests that it could grow by 26.57%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.754%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.37x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 27.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.56x versus 1.22x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 17.71%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.68%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $161.02 which suggests that it could grow by 2.48%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Woodward has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.155%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.37x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 51.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.56x versus 8.51x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 7.56%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $205.23, signalling upside risk potential of 5.68%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $137.93 which suggests that it could grow by 8.18%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.62% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. RTX offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.37x while RTX's PE ratio is 37.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 3.56x versus 2.10x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.