WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 5.78%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.26%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $324.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.35%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.37%. Given that CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.498%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.54x while CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.02x versus 0.51x for CPI Aerostructures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 18.43%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.17%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $324.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.35%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $232.15 which suggests that it could grow by 19.49%. Given that Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe Howmet Aerospace, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.303%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. pays out 9.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is lower than Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s net income of $385M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.54x while Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 54.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.02x versus 9.90x for Howmet Aerospace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 10.12%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.59%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $324.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.35%. On the other hand Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.70 which suggests that it could grow by 69.54%. Given that Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.342%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are larger than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.1M. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.54x while Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.02x versus 2.24x for Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 18.47%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat TransDigm Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $324.75, signalling upside risk potential of 11.35%. On the other hand TransDigm Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,581.10 which suggests that it could grow by 18.23%. Given that TransDigm Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe TransDigm Group, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.95%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. TransDigm Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $90.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than TransDigm Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is lower than TransDigm Group, Inc.'s net income of $450M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.54x while TransDigm Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.02x versus 8.80x for TransDigm Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.