WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Boeing Co. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of -22.94%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat The Boeing Co.'s return on equity of --.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $375.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand The Boeing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $258.04 which suggests that it could grow by 2.64%. Given that Woodward, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Boeing Co., analysts believe Woodward, Inc. is more attractive than The Boeing Co..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.568% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Boeing Co. has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.474%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. The Boeing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. The Boeing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than The Boeing Co. quarterly revenues of $23.3B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than The Boeing Co.'s net income of -$5.3B. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.29x while The Boeing Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.73x versus 2.33x for The Boeing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 19.35%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 44.62%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $375.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $355.65 which suggests that it could grow by 20.28%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.568% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.029%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 17.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.29x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 36.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.73x versus 6.91x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 18.43%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.17%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $375.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe Howmet Aerospace, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.568% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.245%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. pays out 9.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is lower than Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s net income of $385M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.29x while Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 61.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.73x versus 11.10x for Howmet Aerospace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Woodward, Inc.'s net margin of 31.97%. Woodward, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.8% beat Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.01%.

Woodward, Inc. has a consensus price target of $375.13, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.37%. Given that Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has higher upside potential than Woodward, Inc., analysts believe Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. is more attractive than Woodward, Inc..

Woodward, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.568% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.284%.

Woodward, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward, Inc. pays 15.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward, Inc. quarterly revenues are $995.3M, which are larger than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.2M. Woodward, Inc.'s net income of $137.6M is higher than Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Woodward, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.29x while Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward, Inc. is 5.73x versus 4.47x for Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.