DCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 3.86%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.41%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.68%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.557, which suggesting that the stock is 55.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.761%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.13x versus 0.53x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 16.3%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.66%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.41%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.72%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Heico.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.557, which suggesting that the stock is 55.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.432%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is lower than Heico's net income of $168M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while Heico's PE ratio is 53.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.13x versus 7.58x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 24.58%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.41%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,508.96 which suggests that it could grow by 8.24%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.557, which suggesting that the stock is 55.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.22%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are smaller than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2B. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $493M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 49.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.13x versus 9.90x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 11.27%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat Woodward's return on equity of 16.72%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.20, signalling upside risk potential of 38.41%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $205.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.557, which suggesting that the stock is 55.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.346%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $772.7M. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is lower than Woodward's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while Woodward's PE ratio is 31.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.13x versus 3.47x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.