DCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astronics has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of -1.36%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat Astronics's return on equity of -6.41%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $80.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand Astronics has an analysts' consensus of $25.74 which suggests that it could fall by -4.12%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Astronics.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astronics has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.86%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Astronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are smaller than Astronics quarterly revenues of $208.5M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is higher than Astronics's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Astronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.27x versus 1.19x for Astronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 3.86%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $80.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.609%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 13.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.27x versus 0.54x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of -13.31%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -6.68%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $80.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Servotronics.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.456%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $9.8M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is higher than Servotronics's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.27x versus 0.60x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 12.33%. Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26% beat Woodward's return on equity of 17.01%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $80.60, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $205.23 which suggests that it could grow by 4.93%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.62%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $194.1M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $883.6M. Ducommun's net income of $10.5M is lower than Woodward's net income of $108.9M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Woodward's PE ratio is 31.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.27x versus 3.59x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.