ATRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 3.86%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.34%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.4%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 0.90x versus 0.53x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 3.43%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $79.20 which suggests that it could grow by 41.66%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.313%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $197.3M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Ducommun's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ducommun's PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 0.90x versus 1.07x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 16.3%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.66%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of $208.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.78%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Heico.

Astronics has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.865%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Heico's net income of $168M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Heico's PE ratio is 48.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 0.90x versus 6.86x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Astronics's net margin of 11.27%. Astronics's return on equity of -6.41% beat Woodward's return on equity of 16.72%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.87%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $194.23 which suggests that it could grow by 11.48%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.256, which suggesting that the stock is 25.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.328%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $208.5M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $772.7M. Astronics's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Woodward's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Woodward's PE ratio is 29.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 0.90x versus 3.26x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.