HWM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Howmet Aerospace's net margin of 19.91%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 26.91% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Howmet Aerospace has a consensus price target of $140.69, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $221.65 which suggests that it could grow by 14.33%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Howmet Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Howmet Aerospace pays 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Howmet Aerospace's net income of $314M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Howmet Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.99x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howmet Aerospace is 7.16x versus 5.31x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Howmet Aerospace's net margin of 9.53%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 26.91% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Howmet Aerospace has a consensus price target of $140.69, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $522.49 which suggests that it could grow by 12.71%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

Howmet Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Howmet Aerospace pays 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Howmet Aerospace's net income of $314M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Howmet Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.99x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howmet Aerospace is 7.16x versus 1.53x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Howmet Aerospace's net margin of 7.56%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 26.91% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Howmet Aerospace has a consensus price target of $140.69, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $139.65 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Howmet Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. RTX offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Howmet Aerospace pays 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Howmet Aerospace's net income of $314M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Howmet Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.99x while RTX's PE ratio is 35.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howmet Aerospace is 7.16x versus 1.98x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 16.61% compared to Howmet Aerospace's net margin of 11.27%. Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 26.91% beat Woodward's return on equity of 16.72%.

Howmet Aerospace has a consensus price target of $140.69, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $194.23 which suggests that it could grow by 11.48%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.578% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.328%.

Howmet Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Howmet Aerospace pays 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Woodward quarterly revenues of $772.7M. Howmet Aerospace's net income of $314M is higher than Woodward's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Howmet Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.99x while Woodward's PE ratio is 29.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howmet Aerospace is 7.16x versus 3.26x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.