VNCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Vince Holding Corp.'s net margin of -0.69%. Vince Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -38.46% beat Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 69.36%. On the other hand Lifetime Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.17 which suggests that it could grow by 56.09%. Given that Vince Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Vince Holding Corp. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Vince Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 35.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.04%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifetime Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Vince Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays out 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vince Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $85.1M, which are smaller than Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $171.9M. Vince Holding Corp.'s net income of $2.7M is higher than Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Vince Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vince Holding Corp. is 0.14x versus 0.11x for Lifetime Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sypris Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Vince Holding Corp.'s net margin of 1.75%. Vince Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -38.46% beat Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.13%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 69.36%. On the other hand Sypris Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -57.77%. Given that Vince Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Sypris Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Vince Holding Corp. is more attractive than Sypris Solutions, Inc..

Vince Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 35.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sypris Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.861%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sypris Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vince Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sypris Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vince Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $85.1M, which are larger than Sypris Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.7M. Vince Holding Corp.'s net income of $2.7M is higher than Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $501K. Notably, Vince Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vince Holding Corp. is 0.14x versus 0.54x for Sypris Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Vince Holding Corp.'s net margin of 3.44%. Vince Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -38.46% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 69.36%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Vince Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Vince Holding Corp. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Vince Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 35.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.894, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.438%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vince Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vince Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $85.1M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Vince Holding Corp.'s net income of $2.7M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Vince Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 374.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vince Holding Corp. is 0.14x versus 14.97x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Vince Holding Corp.'s net margin of -328.21%. Vince Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -38.46% beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.25, signalling upside risk potential of 69.36%. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 131.45%. Given that Workhorse Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Vince Holding Corp., analysts believe Workhorse Group, Inc. is more attractive than Vince Holding Corp..

Vince Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.640, which suggesting that the stock is 35.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.685, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.495%.

Vince Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vince Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vince Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $85.1M, which are larger than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Vince Holding Corp.'s net income of $2.7M is higher than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Vince Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.08x while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vince Holding Corp. is 0.14x versus 0.20x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.