LCUT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -38.63%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.81%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 713.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.14x versus 0.44x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour, Inc. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -1.4%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Under Armour, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.57%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.81%. On the other hand Under Armour, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.97 which suggests that it could grow by 29.58%. Given that Under Armour, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Under Armour, Inc. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour, Inc. has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.67%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Under Armour, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are smaller than Under Armour, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Under Armour, Inc.'s net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.14x versus 0.39x for Under Armour, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vince Holding Corp. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 16.47%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Vince Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -35.2%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.81%. On the other hand Vince Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 47.57%. Given that Vince Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Vince Holding Corp. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vince Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.636%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Vince Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Vince Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than Vince Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $73.2M. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Vince Holding Corp.'s net income of $12.1M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vince Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 6.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.14x versus 0.13x for Vince Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vera Bradley, Inc. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -6.65%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Vera Bradley, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.33%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.81%. On the other hand Vera Bradley, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 68.78%. Given that Vera Bradley, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Vera Bradley, Inc. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vera Bradley, Inc. has a beta of 1.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.581%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Vera Bradley, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Vera Bradley, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than Vera Bradley, Inc. quarterly revenues of $70.9M. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Vera Bradley, Inc.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vera Bradley, Inc.'s PE ratio is 194.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.14x versus 0.22x for Vera Bradley, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.