LCUT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 152.53%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 81.00x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -1.21%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand Microvast Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 115.95%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 239.213%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Microvast Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $123.3M. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 2.28x for Microvast Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI Corp. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -293.9%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat SES AI Corp.'s return on equity of -33.92%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand SES AI Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.06%. Given that SES AI Corp. has higher upside potential than Lifetime Brands, Inc., analysts believe SES AI Corp. is more attractive than Lifetime Brands, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. SES AI Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than SES AI Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than SES AI Corp.'s net income of -$20.9M. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 36.38x for SES AI Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sypris Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 1.75%. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.28% beat Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.13%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand Sypris Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -47.03%. Given that Lifetime Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sypris Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Lifetime Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Sypris Solutions, Inc..

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.338, which suggesting that the stock is 33.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sypris Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.25%.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.44%. Sypris Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifetime Brands, Inc. pays 25.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Sypris Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lifetime Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $171.9M, which are larger than Sypris Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.7M. Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $501K. Notably, Lifetime Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sypris Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifetime Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.43x for Sypris Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.