ULH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heartland Express, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -4.22%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Heartland Express, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.34%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Heartland Express, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.30 which suggests that it could fall by -8.08%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Heartland Express, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Heartland Express, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Express, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.057%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Heartland Express, Inc. offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Express, Inc. pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are larger than Heartland Express, Inc. quarterly revenues of $196.5M. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Heartland Express, Inc.'s net income of -$8.3M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Heartland Express, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.24x versus 0.81x for Heartland Express, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 0.43%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.99%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.37 which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.621%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. pays out 88.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are smaller than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $8.3M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 59.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.24x versus 1.14x for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Landstar System, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.61%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Landstar System, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.51%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Landstar System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $134.33 which suggests that it could fall by -6.52%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Landstar System, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Landstar System, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System, Inc. has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.015%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Landstar System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are smaller than Landstar System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Landstar System, Inc.'s net income of $19.4M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Landstar System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.24x versus 1.05x for Landstar System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Werner Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -2.73%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Werner Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.63%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Werner Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.93 which suggests that it could fall by -10.25%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Werner Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Werner Enterprises, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Werner Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.193%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Werner Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Werner Enterprises, Inc. pays out 102.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Werner Enterprises, Inc.'s is not.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are smaller than Werner Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $771.5M. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Werner Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$21.1M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Werner Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 73.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.24x versus 0.61x for Werner Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.