ULH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.04%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Landstar System, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.75%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Landstar System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $150.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.22%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Landstar System, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Landstar System, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System, Inc. has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.015%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Landstar System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System, Inc. pays out 47.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are smaller than Landstar System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Landstar System, Inc.'s net income of $23.9M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Landstar System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 45.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.26x versus 1.10x for Landstar System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.76%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.27%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Marten Transport Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.32%. Given that Marten Transport Ltd. has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Marten Transport Ltd. is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.734%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Marten Transport Ltd. offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport Ltd. pays out 114.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marten Transport Ltd.'s is not.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are larger than Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues of $210.1M. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Marten Transport Ltd.'s PE ratio is 59.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.26x versus 1.17x for Marten Transport Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.26%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 25%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $167.79 which suggests that it could fall by -2.78%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.345%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s net income of $270.9M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.26x versus 6.59x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saia, Inc. has a net margin of -18.84% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.28%. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.38% beat Saia, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.95%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Saia, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $354.95 which suggests that it could grow by 3.85%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Saia, Inc., analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Saia, Inc..

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saia, Inc. has a beta of 2.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.321%.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Saia, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. pays 8.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Saia, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $396.8M, which are smaller than Saia, Inc. quarterly revenues of $839.6M. Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$74.8M is lower than Saia, Inc.'s net income of $86.3M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Saia, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings, Inc. is 0.26x versus 2.83x for Saia, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.