ULH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 3.82%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Landstar System's return on equity of 19.63%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.44%. On the other hand Landstar System has an analysts' consensus of $148.03 which suggests that it could grow by 9.2%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.055000000000005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.906%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Landstar System offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System pays out 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are smaller than Landstar System quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Landstar System's net income of $46.2M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while Landstar System's PE ratio is 24.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.35x versus 1.00x for Landstar System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 1.94%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 2.82%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.44%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.14%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Marten Transport, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Marten Transport.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.055000000000005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.727%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $223.2M. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is higher than Marten Transport's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 48.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.35x versus 1.14x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 18.52%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 27.13%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.44%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $167.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5.52%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.055000000000005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.039%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 18.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $254.7M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 29.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.35x versus 5.94x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPO has a net margin of 1.57% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 3.53%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39% beat XPO's return on equity of 25.22%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.44%. On the other hand XPO has an analysts' consensus of $124.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.19%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than XPO, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than XPO.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.055000000000005% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPO has a beta of 2.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.422%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. XPO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. XPO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $382.4M, which are smaller than XPO quarterly revenues of $2B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than XPO's net income of $69M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.33x while XPO's PE ratio is 34.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.35x versus 1.66x for XPO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.