KNX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net margin of 3.82%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 1.66% beat Landstar System's return on equity of 19.63%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a consensus price target of $54.58, signalling upside risk potential of 38.08%. On the other hand Landstar System has an analysts' consensus of $151.81 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.328%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Landstar System offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System pays out 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Landstar System quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $69.5M is higher than Landstar System's net income of $46.2M. Notably, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.15x while Landstar System's PE ratio is 24.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is 0.87x versus 1.02x for Landstar System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net margin of 18.99%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 1.66% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 27.98%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a consensus price target of $54.58, signalling upside risk potential of 38.08%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $177.79 which suggests that it could grow by 16.32%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Dominion Freight Line, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than Old Dominion Freight Line.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.127%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 18.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $69.5M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $263.1M. Notably, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.15x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 27.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is 0.87x versus 5.69x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saia has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net margin of 9.65%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 1.66% beat Saia's return on equity of 17%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a consensus price target of $54.58, signalling upside risk potential of 38.08%. On the other hand Saia has an analysts' consensus of $426.20 which suggests that it could grow by 28.87%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than Saia, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than Saia.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saia has a beta of 1.987, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.659%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Saia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Saia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Saia quarterly revenues of $789M. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $69.5M is lower than Saia's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.15x while Saia's PE ratio is 24.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is 0.87x versus 2.76x for Saia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPO has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net margin of 3.9%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 1.66% beat XPO's return on equity of 26.37%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a consensus price target of $54.58, signalling upside risk potential of 38.08%. On the other hand XPO has an analysts' consensus of $128.58 which suggests that it could grow by 34.45%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than XPO, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than XPO.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.099% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPO has a beta of 2.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.66%.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. XPO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. XPO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than XPO quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $69.5M is lower than XPO's net income of $75M. Notably, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.15x while XPO's PE ratio is 29.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is 0.87x versus 1.42x for XPO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.