SNDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heartland Express has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Schneider National's net margin of -6.32%. Schneider National's return on equity of 4.2% beat Heartland Express's return on equity of -3.44%.

Schneider National has a consensus price target of $26.95, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Heartland Express has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.59%. Given that Heartland Express has higher upside potential than Schneider National, analysts believe Heartland Express is more attractive than Schneider National.

Schneider National has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Express has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.146%.

Schneider National has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Heartland Express offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Schneider National pays 56.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Express pays out -15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Schneider National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schneider National quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Heartland Express quarterly revenues of $219.4M. Schneider National's net income of $26.1M is higher than Heartland Express's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Schneider National's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.40x while Heartland Express's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schneider National is 0.83x versus 0.68x for Heartland Express. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JB Hunt Transport Services has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Schneider National's net margin of 4.39%. Schneider National's return on equity of 4.2% beat JB Hunt Transport Services's return on equity of 14.12%.

Schneider National has a consensus price target of $26.95, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand JB Hunt Transport Services has an analysts' consensus of $157.64 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that Schneider National has higher upside potential than JB Hunt Transport Services, analysts believe Schneider National is more attractive than JB Hunt Transport Services.

Schneider National has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JB Hunt Transport Services has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.219%.

Schneider National has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. JB Hunt Transport Services offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Schneider National pays 56.92% of its earnings as a dividend. JB Hunt Transport Services pays out 30.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schneider National quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than JB Hunt Transport Services quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Schneider National's net income of $26.1M is lower than JB Hunt Transport Services's net income of $128.6M. Notably, Schneider National's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.40x while JB Hunt Transport Services's PE ratio is 27.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schneider National is 0.83x versus 1.27x for JB Hunt Transport Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Landstar System has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Schneider National's net margin of 2.59%. Schneider National's return on equity of 4.2% beat Landstar System's return on equity of 18.09%.

Schneider National has a consensus price target of $26.95, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Landstar System has an analysts' consensus of $141.48 which suggests that it could grow by 3.65%. Given that Schneider National has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Schneider National is more attractive than Landstar System.

Schneider National has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.855%.

Schneider National has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Landstar System offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Schneider National pays 56.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System pays out 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schneider National quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Landstar System quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Schneider National's net income of $26.1M is lower than Landstar System's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Schneider National's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.40x while Landstar System's PE ratio is 27.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schneider National is 0.83x versus 1.01x for Landstar System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Schneider National's net margin of 1.57%. Schneider National's return on equity of 4.2% beat Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 13.39%.

Schneider National has a consensus price target of $26.95, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Universal Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.98%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Schneider National, analysts believe Universal Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Schneider National.

Schneider National has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.67200000000001%.

Schneider National has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Universal Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Schneider National pays 56.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings pays out 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schneider National quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of $382.4M. Schneider National's net income of $26.1M is higher than Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, Schneider National's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.40x while Universal Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is 8.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schneider National is 0.83x versus 0.40x for Universal Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.