MRTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hub Group, Inc. has a net margin of 1.01% compared to Marten Transport Ltd.'s net margin of 3.1%. Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.52% beat Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.7%. On the other hand Hub Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.81 which suggests that it could grow by 0.41%. Given that Hub Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marten Transport Ltd., analysts believe Hub Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marten Transport Ltd..

Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.727%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Hub Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Marten Transport Ltd. pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc. pays out 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $220.5M, which are smaller than Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $934.5M. Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M. Notably, Marten Transport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.04x while Hub Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport Ltd. is 1.01x versus 0.64x for Hub Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Landstar System, Inc. has a net margin of 1.01% compared to Marten Transport Ltd.'s net margin of 1.61%. Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.52% beat Landstar System, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.51%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.7%. On the other hand Landstar System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $131.07 which suggests that it could fall by -6.88%. Given that Landstar System, Inc. has more downside risk than Marten Transport Ltd., analysts believe Marten Transport Ltd. is more attractive than Landstar System, Inc..

Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.934%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Landstar System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Marten Transport Ltd. pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $220.5M, which are smaller than Landstar System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Landstar System, Inc.'s net income of $19.4M. Notably, Marten Transport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.04x while Landstar System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport Ltd. is 1.01x versus 1.03x for Landstar System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a net margin of 1.01% compared to Marten Transport Ltd.'s net margin of 19.26%. Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.52% beat Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 25%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.7%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $155.46 which suggests that it could grow by 1.27%. Given that Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marten Transport Ltd., analysts believe Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. is more attractive than Marten Transport Ltd..

Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.184%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Marten Transport Ltd. pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $220.5M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s net income of $270.9M. Notably, Marten Transport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.04x while Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport Ltd. is 1.01x versus 5.86x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PAMT Corp. has a net margin of 1.01% compared to Marten Transport Ltd.'s net margin of -3.72%. Marten Transport Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.52% beat PAMT Corp.'s return on equity of -20.49%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.7%. On the other hand PAMT Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.88%. Given that PAMT Corp. has higher upside potential than Marten Transport Ltd., analysts believe PAMT Corp. is more attractive than Marten Transport Ltd..

Marten Transport Ltd. has a beta of 0.884, which suggesting that the stock is 11.628% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PAMT Corp. has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.999%.

Marten Transport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. PAMT Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marten Transport Ltd. pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. PAMT Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marten Transport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $220.5M, which are larger than PAMT Corp. quarterly revenues of $150.3M. Marten Transport Ltd.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than PAMT Corp.'s net income of -$5.6M. Notably, Marten Transport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.04x while PAMT Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marten Transport Ltd. is 1.01x versus 0.33x for PAMT Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.