TREE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 3.3% compared to LendingTree, Inc.'s net margin of -5.13%. LendingTree, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.7% beat Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of -6.26%.

LendingTree, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.33, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LendingTree, Inc. has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc., analysts believe LendingTree, Inc. is more attractive than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc..

LendingTree, Inc. has a beta of 2.082, which suggesting that the stock is 108.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.887%.

LendingTree, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingTree, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingTree, Inc. quarterly revenues are $307.8M, which are larger than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. LendingTree, Inc.'s net income of $10.2M is higher than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$121.9K. Notably, LendingTree, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.96x while Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.85x for Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust Corp. has a net margin of 3.3% compared to LendingTree, Inc.'s net margin of 12.65%. LendingTree, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.7% beat Northern Trust Corp.'s return on equity of 13.32%.

LendingTree, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.33, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand Northern Trust Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $134.64 which suggests that it could fall by -3.45%. Given that LendingTree, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northern Trust Corp., analysts believe LendingTree, Inc. is more attractive than Northern Trust Corp..

LendingTree, Inc. has a beta of 2.082, which suggesting that the stock is 108.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust Corp. has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.372%.

LendingTree, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Trust Corp. offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. LendingTree, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp. pays out 30.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LendingTree, Inc. quarterly revenues are $307.8M, which are smaller than Northern Trust Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. LendingTree, Inc.'s net income of $10.2M is lower than Northern Trust Corp.'s net income of $453.4M. Notably, LendingTree, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.96x while Northern Trust Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree, Inc. is 0.68x versus 1.89x for Northern Trust Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.3% compared to LendingTree, Inc.'s net margin of 11.48%. LendingTree, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.7% beat Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.78%.

LendingTree, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.33, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand Upstart Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.38 which suggests that it could grow by 16.38%. Given that LendingTree, Inc. has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, Inc., analysts believe LendingTree, Inc. is more attractive than Upstart Holdings, Inc..

LendingTree, Inc. has a beta of 2.082, which suggesting that the stock is 108.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LendingTree, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upstart Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingTree, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upstart Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingTree, Inc. quarterly revenues are $307.8M, which are larger than Upstart Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $277.1M. LendingTree, Inc.'s net income of $10.2M is lower than Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $31.8M. Notably, LendingTree, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.96x while Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 209.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree, Inc. is 0.68x versus 4.91x for Upstart Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.