TREE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Financial Gravity Companies has a net margin of -22.23% compared to LendingTree's net margin of --. LendingTree's return on equity of -30.49% beat Financial Gravity Companies's return on equity of --.

LendingTree has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.36%. On the other hand Financial Gravity Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Companies, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than Financial Gravity Companies.

LendingTree has a beta of 2.029, which suggesting that the stock is 102.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Financial Gravity Companies has a beta of -1.019, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.882%.

LendingTree has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Financial Gravity Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingTree pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Financial Gravity Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingTree quarterly revenues are $260.8M, which are larger than Financial Gravity Companies quarterly revenues of --. LendingTree's net income of -$58M is higher than Financial Gravity Companies's net income of --. Notably, LendingTree's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Financial Gravity Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree is 0.68x versus 4.62x for Financial Gravity Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of -22.23% compared to LendingTree's net margin of -5.94%. LendingTree's return on equity of -30.49% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89%.

LendingTree has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.36%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

LendingTree has a beta of 2.029, which suggesting that the stock is 102.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LendingTree has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Atlantic BDC offers a yield of 8.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. LendingTree pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingTree quarterly revenues are $260.8M, which are larger than Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues of $2.8M. LendingTree's net income of -$58M is lower than Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K. Notably, LendingTree's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Atlantic BDC's PE ratio is 18.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree is 0.68x versus 6.55x for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of -22.23% compared to LendingTree's net margin of 23.62%. LendingTree's return on equity of -30.49% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 13.79%.

LendingTree has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.36%. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $91.93 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than Northern Trust, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than Northern Trust.

LendingTree has a beta of 2.029, which suggesting that the stock is 102.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.817%.

LendingTree has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. LendingTree pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 59.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LendingTree quarterly revenues are $260.8M, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. LendingTree's net income of -$58M is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $464.9M. Notably, LendingTree's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 12.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree is 0.68x versus 2.65x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

180 Degree Capital has a net margin of -22.23% compared to LendingTree's net margin of --. LendingTree's return on equity of -30.49% beat 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71%.

LendingTree has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 71.36%. On the other hand 180 Degree Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

LendingTree has a beta of 2.029, which suggesting that the stock is 102.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.544%.

LendingTree has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 180 Degree Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingTree pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 180 Degree Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingTree quarterly revenues are $260.8M, which are larger than 180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues of --. LendingTree's net income of -$58M is higher than 180 Degree Capital's net income of --. Notably, LendingTree's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 180 Degree Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingTree is 0.68x versus -- for 180 Degree Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.