FGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 58.62%. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of -6.26% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.8%.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc., analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is more attractive than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc..

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 196.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 12.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. pays out 117.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.1M. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$121.9K is lower than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M. Notably, Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. is 0.74x versus 4.54x for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust Corp. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 12.65%. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of -6.26% beat Northern Trust Corp.'s return on equity of 13.32%.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northern Trust Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $134.64 which suggests that it could fall by -4.31%. Given that Northern Trust Corp. has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc., analysts believe Northern Trust Corp. is more attractive than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc..

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 196.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust Corp. has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.372%.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Trust Corp. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp. pays out 30.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Northern Trust Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$121.9K is lower than Northern Trust Corp.'s net income of $453.4M. Notably, Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Trust Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. is 0.74x versus 1.91x for Northern Trust Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 3.3%. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of -6.26% beat LendingTree, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.7%.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LendingTree, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $81.33 which suggests that it could grow by 50.28%. Given that LendingTree, Inc. has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc., analysts believe LendingTree, Inc. is more attractive than Financial Gravity Cos., Inc..

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.969, which suggesting that the stock is 196.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree, Inc. has a beta of 2.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.176%.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LendingTree, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than LendingTree, Inc. quarterly revenues of $307.8M. Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$121.9K is lower than LendingTree, Inc.'s net income of $10.2M. Notably, Financial Gravity Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LendingTree, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Financial Gravity Cos., Inc. is 0.74x versus 0.70x for LendingTree, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.