LIEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Northern Trust has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of 23.24%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 16.33%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $13.28, signalling upside risk potential of 26.96%. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $106.68 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than Northern Trust, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than Northern Trust.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.953%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.28%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 31.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $455.4M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 9.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.03x versus 2.17x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of 2.87%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -34.49%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $13.28, signalling upside risk potential of 26.96%. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $66.57 which suggests that it could grow by 47.45%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 1.901, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.124%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.28%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $261.5M. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is lower than LendingTree's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.03x versus 0.67x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

180 Degree Capital has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC's net margin of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89% beat 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a consensus price target of $13.28, signalling upside risk potential of 26.96%. On the other hand 180 Degree Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.363%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.28%. 180 Degree Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays 129.07% of its earnings as a dividend. 180 Degree Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues are $2.8M, which are larger than 180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues of --. Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K is higher than 180 Degree Capital's net income of --. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while 180 Degree Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC is 6.03x versus 105.44x for 180 Degree Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.