LIEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Solana Co. has a net margin of 58.62% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net margin of -50612.34%. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Solana Co.'s return on equity of -575.18%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Solana Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95746.6%. Given that Solana Co. has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc., analysts believe Solana Co. is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc..

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solana Co. has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.596%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.14%. Solana Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. pays 117.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Solana Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are larger than Solana Co. quarterly revenues of $697K. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M is higher than Solana Co.'s net income of -$352.8M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Solana Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is 4.49x versus 9.44x for Solana Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a net margin of 58.62% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net margin of 40.3%. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand MSC Income Fund, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 18.81%. Given that MSC Income Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc., analysts believe MSC Income Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc..

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.14%. MSC Income Fund, Inc. offers a yield of 10.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. pays 117.17% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund, Inc. pays out 103.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are smaller than MSC Income Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues of $25.5M. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M is lower than MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is 4.49x versus 5.68x for MSC Income Fund, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust Corp. has a net margin of 58.62% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net margin of 12.65%. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat Northern Trust Corp.'s return on equity of 13.32%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Northern Trust Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $141.25 which suggests that it could fall by -2.15%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northern Trust Corp., analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is more attractive than Northern Trust Corp..

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust Corp. has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.689%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.14%. Northern Trust Corp. offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. pays 117.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp. pays out 30.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s is not.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are smaller than Northern Trust Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M is lower than Northern Trust Corp.'s net income of $453.4M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Northern Trust Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is 4.49x versus 1.95x for Northern Trust Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree, Inc. has a net margin of 58.62% compared to Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net margin of 3.3%. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.8% beat LendingTree, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.7%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand LendingTree, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $81.33 which suggests that it could grow by 45.92%. Given that LendingTree, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc., analysts believe LendingTree, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc..

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree, Inc. has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.147%.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.14%. LendingTree, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. pays 117.17% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are smaller than LendingTree, Inc. quarterly revenues of $307.8M. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M is lower than LendingTree, Inc.'s net income of $10.2M. Notably, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while LendingTree, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. is 4.49x versus 0.72x for LendingTree, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.