MSIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a net margin of 40.3% compared to MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net margin of 58.62%. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.8%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.76%. Given that MSC Income Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc., analysts believe MSC Income Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc..

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.54%. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 12.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. MSC Income Fund, Inc. pays 103.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. pays out 117.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are $25.5M, which are larger than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.1M. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is higher than Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M. Notably, MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund, Inc. is 5.75x versus 4.55x for Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Main Street Capital has a net margin of 40.3% compared to MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net margin of 97.79%. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57% beat Main Street Capital's return on equity of 18.96%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand Main Street Capital has an analysts' consensus of $62.86 which suggests that it could fall by -2.05%. Given that MSC Income Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Main Street Capital, analysts believe MSC Income Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Main Street Capital.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Main Street Capital has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.046%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.54%. Main Street Capital offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. MSC Income Fund, Inc. pays 103.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital pays out 50.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s is not.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are $25.5M, which are smaller than Main Street Capital quarterly revenues of $126.5M. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is lower than Main Street Capital's net income of $123.7M. Notably, MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Main Street Capital's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund, Inc. is 5.75x versus 9.26x for Main Street Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust Corp. has a net margin of 40.3% compared to MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net margin of 12.8%. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57% beat Northern Trust Corp.'s return on equity of 13.35%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand Northern Trust Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $145.68 which suggests that it could fall by -6.35%. Given that MSC Income Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northern Trust Corp., analysts believe MSC Income Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Northern Trust Corp..

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust Corp. has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.689%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.54%. Northern Trust Corp. offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. MSC Income Fund, Inc. pays 103.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp. pays out 35.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s is not.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are $25.5M, which are smaller than Northern Trust Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is lower than Northern Trust Corp.'s net income of $461.7M. Notably, MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Northern Trust Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund, Inc. is 5.75x versus 2.06x for Northern Trust Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree, Inc. has a net margin of 40.3% compared to MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net margin of 3.3%. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57% beat LendingTree, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.7%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.47%. On the other hand LendingTree, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $81.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.51%. Given that LendingTree, Inc. has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, Inc., analysts believe LendingTree, Inc. is more attractive than MSC Income Fund, Inc..

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree, Inc. has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.147%.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.54%. LendingTree, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund, Inc. pays 103.01% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MSC Income Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are $25.5M, which are smaller than LendingTree, Inc. quarterly revenues of $307.8M. MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s net income of $26.5M is higher than LendingTree, Inc.'s net income of $10.2M. Notably, MSC Income Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while LendingTree, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund, Inc. is 5.75x versus 0.87x for LendingTree, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.